2005 IEEE International Reliability Physics Symposium, 2005. Proceedings. 43rd Annual.
DOI: 10.1109/relphy.2005.1493075
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Latch-up in 65nm CMOS technology: a scaling perspective

Abstract: TECHNOLOGIES INVESTIGATEDIn this study, through a detailed analysis of the last four CMOS technology nodes targeting similar applications, the intrinsic latch-up process sensitivity will be investigated in an attempt to assess in which measure latch-up will continue to be a major reliability concern for future CMOS technologies. [Keywor-dy: Latch-up, CMOS for low-power applications, CMOS Scaling, High current behavior] Latch-up (LU) in CMOS technologies is a well-established 0-7803-8803-8/05/~20.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

2
12
0

Publication Types

Select...
4
4

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
2
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The simulated temperature at which the devices go from latchup-immune to latchup-susceptible matches the experimental data provided for electrical latchup shown by Boselli [26] to within C. Both of these publications predict onset of latchup susceptibility at 340 K, or 67 C. These simulations are based on a single temperature throughout the device. While the simulation/experimental holding voltage in Fig.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 70%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The simulated temperature at which the devices go from latchup-immune to latchup-susceptible matches the experimental data provided for electrical latchup shown by Boselli [26] to within C. Both of these publications predict onset of latchup susceptibility at 340 K, or 67 C. These simulations are based on a single temperature throughout the device. While the simulation/experimental holding voltage in Fig.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 70%
“…It is common practice to pack devices more tightly in regularly repeating memory arrays than allowed in logic-circuitry design. In addition, the well and substrate resistances seen by sources in the SRAMs are much higher than those seen in the test devices in [15], [26], as those devices were 20 m wide. Given the 30% reduction in the base length of the parasitic bipolar transistors in the feedback path and a more favorable biasing condition with more than a 10 increase in resistance, the most sensitive devices in the SRAM arrays are vulnerable at room temperature.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 82%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Figure 1 (a) demonstrates the cross section of a DW internal latchup test structure. It can be seen it consists of the NPN and PNP parasitic bipolar transistors [8]. The horizontal and vertical well resistances which depend on the tap spacing and diffusion areas respectively have been drawn in the same figure.…”
Section: Test Structuresmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The silicon-controlled rectifier (SCR) device has been reported to be useful for ESD protection due to its high ESD robustness, small device size, and excellent clamping capabilities (low holding voltage and small turn-ON resistance) [8]- [10]. Besides, the SCR device can be safely used without latchup danger in advanced CMOS technologies with low supply voltage [11]. The ESD protection design for I/O cells with embedded SCR [12] and the high-voltage output arrays with embedded SCR [13] have been reported.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%