KRW oxygen-blown gasification combined cycle: Carbon dioxide recovery, transport, and disposal

Doctor, R.D.; Molburg, J.C.; Thimmapuram, P.

doi:10.2172/373835

Cited by 35 publications

(34 citation statements)

References 2 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…Table 3. Approach temperatures used in Aspen Plus to characterize non-equilibrium ([Altafini, 2003;Zaimal, 2002, Zhu, 2003 Table 11: Water gas shift reactor cost data adjusted to the dollar value in 2000 [Doctor, 1996] Table 12: Gas-liquid heat exchanger cost data adjusted to the dollar value in 2000 [Doctor, 1996] Table 13: Gas-gas heat exchanger cost data adjusted to the dollar value in 2000 [Doctor, 1996] Table 16 Relative solubility of gases in Selexol solvent [Doctor, 1994] Table 21 Absorber cost data adjusted to the dollar values in 2000 [Doctor, 1996] Table 22 Power recovery turbine cost data adjusted to the dollar value in 2000 [Doctor, 1996] Table 23 Sump tank cost data adjusted to the dollar value in 2000 [Doctor, 1996] Table 24 Recycle compressor cost data adjusted to the dollar value in 2000 [Doctor, 1996] Table 25 Selexol pump cost data adjusted to the dollar value in 2000 [Doctor, 1996] …”

Section: Total Revenue Requiredmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Any of the process facility costs can be expressed for a different year using the Chemical Engineering Plant Cost Index. [Doctor, 1996] …”

Section: Shift Reactor Vesselsmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Generally, the cost of a heat exchanger depends on its heat exchange surface, which is determined by the heat load of the exchanger and the temperature difference between the hot and cold flows. To allow for variations in these parameters, the process facility cost of the gas-liquid type heat exchanger was regressed using the data in [Doctor, 1996] …”

Section: Heat Exchangersmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…The solubility of CO 2 as a function of temperature is regressed based on published data [Doctor 1996, Black 2000 and given in Equation (43),…”

Section: Temperature Effect On Gas Solubilitymentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Each is determined from actual costs and key performance parameters. [Doctor, 1996] PFC ( Using the data in Table 21, the process facility costs of the absorption column are regressed as a function of the operating pressure, the flow rates of the solvent and syngas. The process facility cost for the absorber in 1,000 US$ for 2000$ is: [Doctor, 1996] PFC ( Based on the data in Table 22, the process facility cost of the power recovery turbine is given in 1,000 US$ for 2000$ as follows: Sump Tank Table 23 Sump tank cost data adjusted to the dollar value in 2000 [Doctor, 1996] PFC ( The process facility cost of the sump tank is regressed as a function of the solvent flow rate as given in Table 23.…”

Section: Process Facility Costsmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 4 more Smart Citations

Development and Application of Optimal Design Capability for Coal Gasification Systems

Rubin¹,

Rao²,

Berkenpas³

2007

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Section: Total Revenue Requiredmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Any of the process facility costs can be expressed for a different year using the Chemical Engineering Plant Cost Index. [Doctor, 1996] …”

Section: Shift Reactor Vesselsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Heat Exchangersmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…The solubility of CO 2 as a function of temperature is regressed based on published data [Doctor 1996, Black 2000 and given in Equation (43),…”

Section: Temperature Effect On Gas Solubilitymentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Process Facility Costsmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 3 more Smart Citations

Development and Application of Optimal Design Capability for Coal Gasification Systems

Rubin¹,

Rao²,

Berkenpas³

2007

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

A comprehensive techno-economic analysis method for power generation systems with CO2 capture

Jin

Yang

et al. 2009

Int. J. Energy Res.

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

SUMMARYA new comprehensive techno-economic analysis method for power generation systems with CO 2 capture is proposed in this paper. The correlative relationship between the efficiency penalty, investment increment, and CO 2 avoidance cost is established. Through theoretical derivation, typical system analysis, and variation trends investigation, the mutual influence between technical and economic factors and their impacts on the CO 2 avoidance cost are studied. At the same time, the important role that system integration plays in CO 2 avoidance is investigated based on the analysis of a novel partial gasification CO 2 recovery system. The results reveal that for the power generation systems with CO 2 capture, the efficiency penalty not only affects the costs on fuel, but the incremental investment cost for CO 2 capture (U.S.$ kW À1 ) as well. Consequently, it will have a decisive impact on the CO 2 avoidance cost. Therefore, the added attention should be paid to improve the technical performance in order to reduce the efficiency penalty in energy system with CO 2 capture and storage. Additionally, the system integration may not only decrease the efficiency penalty, but also simplify the system structure and keep the investment increment at a low level, and thereby it reduces the CO 2 avoidance cost significantly. For example, for the novel partial gasification CO 2 recovery system, owing to system integration, its efficiency can reach 42.2%, with 70% of CO 2 capture, and its investment cost is only 87$ kW À1 higher than that of the reference IGCC system, thereby the CO 2 avoidance cost is only 6.23$ t À1 CO 2 . The obtained results provide a comprehensive technical-economical analysis method for energy systems with CO 2 capture useful for reducing the avoidance costs.

show abstract

Techno-economic assessment of CO₂liquefaction for ship transportation

Zahid

Lee

et al. 2014

Greenhouse Gas Sci Technol

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Carbon capture and storage (CCS) is a key technology for addressing global warming by capturing carbon dioxide and storing it somewhere, usually underground. The transportation of CO 2 is required since storage sites are not necessarily present near the source sites. Ships can be used for long distance transport of CO 2 . However, CO 2 sources are not always located near the coast; hence onshore transportation may be required in addition to ship for transportation of CO 2 from source sites to storage site. Liquefaction is a vital component in ship transportation. In this study, a state-of-the-art CO 2 liquefaction processes have been designed by taking CO 2 capture facilities into account. The proposed processes require lower liquefaction energy compared to other processes found in the literature. Suitable thermodynamic conditions are required for economical transport of CO 2 . Therefore, three scenarios each for post-combustion and pre-combustion have been studied in order to explore the effect of thermodynamic conditions on the economics of CO 2 transport. The considered scenarios are categorized on the basis of liquefaction plant location as: (i) the capture site, liquefaction plant and shipping terminal are located close to each other; (ii) the capture site and liquefaction plant are far from shipping terminal; (iii) the capture site is far from liquefaction plant and shipping terminal. The scenarios results were useful for deciding the optimum liquefaction plant location. Finally, an economic analysis is performed in order to evaluate the feasibility of CO 2 transport from source sites to ship loading terminal.

show abstract

KRW oxygen-blown gasification combined cycle: Carbon dioxide recovery, transport, and disposal

Cited by 35 publications

References 2 publications

Development and Application of Optimal Design Capability for Coal Gasification Systems

Development and Application of Optimal Design Capability for Coal Gasification Systems

A comprehensive techno-economic analysis method for power generation systems with CO2 capture

Techno-economic assessment of CO₂liquefaction for ship transportation

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About

KRW oxygen-blown gasification combined cycle: Carbon dioxide recovery, transport, and disposal

Cited by 35 publications

References 2 publications

Development and Application of Optimal Design Capability for Coal Gasification Systems

Development and Application of Optimal Design Capability for Coal Gasification Systems

A comprehensive techno-economic analysis method for power generation systems with CO2 capture

Techno-economic assessment of CO2liquefaction for ship transportation

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About

Techno-economic assessment of CO₂liquefaction for ship transportation