2009
DOI: 10.18848/1447-9524/cgp/v09i01/50718
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Knowledge Management Integrating Organizational Learning in a Military Context: The 3M Model

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This theme is represented by the following words: explicit knowledge, tacit knowledge, knowledge processes (including knowledge creation, knowledge sharing, knowledge socialization and knowledge transfer), knowledge system, organizational knowledge, knowledge intensive organization and the work knowledge management-KM. In general, the majority of the studies on this topic are those that directly approach knowledge management in relation to OL in a conceptual way (for example, Pun and Nathai-Balkissoon, 2011) or from empirical studies (Farias et al, 2009) and/or LO (Pun and Nathai-Balkissoon, 2011;Newman and Newman, 2015); and those papers that link learning to knowledge creation (Gil and Carrillo, 2013;Vargas et al, 2016), knowledge sharing (Aizpurua et al, 2011) and organizational knowledge (Loss et al, 2010). There are also studies that use a learning perspective as one of the dimensions considered in the implementation diagnosis of a KM program (Ribeiro and Stano, 2010) or specifically focus on "knowledge intensive organization" (Schardosim et al, 2017).…”
Section: Organizational Learning In Latinmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This theme is represented by the following words: explicit knowledge, tacit knowledge, knowledge processes (including knowledge creation, knowledge sharing, knowledge socialization and knowledge transfer), knowledge system, organizational knowledge, knowledge intensive organization and the work knowledge management-KM. In general, the majority of the studies on this topic are those that directly approach knowledge management in relation to OL in a conceptual way (for example, Pun and Nathai-Balkissoon, 2011) or from empirical studies (Farias et al, 2009) and/or LO (Pun and Nathai-Balkissoon, 2011;Newman and Newman, 2015); and those papers that link learning to knowledge creation (Gil and Carrillo, 2013;Vargas et al, 2016), knowledge sharing (Aizpurua et al, 2011) and organizational knowledge (Loss et al, 2010). There are also studies that use a learning perspective as one of the dimensions considered in the implementation diagnosis of a KM program (Ribeiro and Stano, 2010) or specifically focus on "knowledge intensive organization" (Schardosim et al, 2017).…”
Section: Organizational Learning In Latinmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this dimension of application, the registration and the representation of knowledge collaborate for the purpose of organizational performance, as presented by Farias, Oliveira and Souza (2009), which use ontology, in order to identify, share and present the Different knowledge of the stakeholders. Allaho and Lee (2014) also discuss the application of knowledge aided by a system of recommendation In dimension (d) "Analyze", there is an explanation of the connections between ideas, because a "collapse" of communication in its constituent elements or parts for a general purpose (Krathwohl, 2002) occurs.…”
Section: Purpose Technologies Authorsmentioning
confidence: 99%