2013
DOI: 10.1111/blar.12067
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Itamaraty on the Move: Institutional and Political Change inBrazilian Foreign Service underLuladaSilva'sPresidency (2003–2010)

Abstract: This article aims to provide answers to two questions prompted by the latest reforms of Brazilian foreign service during Lula da Silva's presidency: How exactly might these institutional changes generate any impact over the Brazilian diplomatic corporation cohesion at large? How could bureaucratic insulation be undermined as an unexpected outcome of this process? To accomplish their objectives, the authors will briefly review the process of institution-building in Brazil, with an emphasis on the diplomatic cor… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0
10

Year Published

2014
2014
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7
3

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 23 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
0
3
0
10
Order By: Relevance
“…The relevance of these conditions was highly intuitive in light of the literature on presidential appointments and patterns of bureaucratic recruitment in the region (Amorim Neto and Malamud, 2019; Dalbosco, 2014; Faria and Casarões, 2013; Figueroa and Schiavon, 2014), but the impact of different configurations could not be told beforehand. We found some apparently obvious combinations, but also several unexpected ones, that foster or hinder delegation.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The relevance of these conditions was highly intuitive in light of the literature on presidential appointments and patterns of bureaucratic recruitment in the region (Amorim Neto and Malamud, 2019; Dalbosco, 2014; Faria and Casarões, 2013; Figueroa and Schiavon, 2014), but the impact of different configurations could not be told beforehand. We found some apparently obvious combinations, but also several unexpected ones, that foster or hinder delegation.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Executive bureaucracies have received little attention in the study of Latin American politics, note Polga‐Hecimovich and Trelles (), though they do not separately address foreign affairs. Brazil's influential foreign ministry, Itamaraty, was a partial exception (De Faria et al, ), but recent scholarship on Brazil also increasingly focuses on overriding presidentialism (Cason and Power, ; Fenwick et al, ).…”
Section: Presidentialism and Colombian Foreign Policymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Na expressão de Rubens Ricupero (2001), teria ruído o "consenso de Tancredo". A principal plataforma institucional para a observação empírica do fenômeno é o Ministério das Relações Exteriores, que, a pretexto de adequar-se ao que se esperava dele em um regime democrático (uma maior aproximação com o interesse manifestado pelo público), promoveu muitas e intensas reformas -as quais foram, até certo ponto, dramáticas, dado o dilema distributivo envolvido -em seus mecanismos de recrutamento, promoção e avaliação de mérito profissional (Faria, Belém Lopes e Casarões, 2013).…”
Section: Rumo à Erosão Do Estamento Itamaratiano? Algumas Consideraçõunclassified