Is the user trained? Assessing performance and cognitive resource demands in the Virtusphere

Abstract

Virtual reality systems provide a convenient means of studying human cognition and performance on a wide range of tasks for which real-world testing is cost prohibitive or difficult to control. For the results of such studies to be valid, it is important to ensure that aspects of the virtual experience do not alter a participant's behavior or performance on the experimental tasks. This can be particularly difficult when using novel locomotion interfaces that require training. Training procedures should not be completed until movement tasks can be performed at a high level of ability and they do not interfere with concurrent cognitive tasks.A study is described in which subjects were trained to locomote in the Virtusphere, an interface resembling a "human-sized hamster ball." The effectiveness of training is discussed in terms of both movement abilities and performance on a concurrent cognitive task. Movement performance was tracked as subjects learned to travel through a virtual environment. Additionally, subjects simultaneously completed cognitive tasks in a dual-task selectiveinterference paradigm. Results showed very rapid improvement on movement measures, including distance traveled and the ratio of collisions to distance traveled, with performance improvement becoming gradual within a few minutes. However, results also highlight persistent problems with concurrent spatial memory tasks, indicating that the training is not really done when performance on the movement metrics levels off.

Cognitive Resource Demands of Redirected Walking

“…We maintained a fixed order of the cognitive conditions, but randomized the locomotion conditions. This ensured that none of the cognitive tasks would be favored due to potential training effects (see also [17]). …”

Orientation and metacognition in virtual space.

“…Accordingly, there are natural limits to what VR without actual motion can achieve as a tool for research in spatial cognition (Taube, Valerio, & Yoder, 2013). Fortunately, increasingly resources exist that allow for a simulation of embodiment in virtual space, such as virtuspheres, VR goggles, caves (Waller et al, 2007), and the like, all of which, however, come with challenges of their own (Fröhlich & Wachsmuth, 2013; Marsh et al, 2013). In some respects, navigating in the real world will remain unique.…”

Using Virtual Reality to Enforce Principles of Cybersecurity

“…Some solutions place the user within a large external motion capture system and allow the floor to move beneath them while they walk. These solutions cannot currently create an accurate feel of a floor space and do not recreate the internal feeling of walking [3,12]. Other solutions implement motion in software, either by teleporting the user on their command or by guided motion, as if fixed on a track.…”