2019
DOI: 10.1109/jeds.2019.2935319
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Investigation of the Scalability of Emerging Nanotube Junctionless FETs Using an Intrinsic Pocket

Abstract: The detrimental lateral band-to-band tunneling (L-BTBT) governing the OFF-state performance of the junctionless (JL) FETs is more pronounced in emerging Nanotube (NT) transistor architectures. This restricts the scaling of NT JLFETs irrespective of their ultimate electrostatic gate control due to additional core gate. Therefore, in this paper, we propose a symmetric intrinsic pocketed P i -NT JLFET which has narrow intrinsic pockets on both sides of the channel region leading to a diminished L-BTBT induced lat… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Extra core gate limits the scalability of Nanotube Junctionless FETs regardless of their eventual electrostatic gate control as a result, a symmetric intrinsic pocketed Pi NT JLFET with small inherent pockets at both the sides of the channel has a lower L-BTBT, resulting lateral parasitic bipolar junction transistor activity in the upcoming nanotubes. This device structure has been proposed by Jain et al 35 As observed through simulations, for a gate length of 20 nm, addition of an intrinsic pocket minimises the OFF current in the Pi-NT-JLFET by about two orders of magnitude, resulting in a significant I ON /I OFF ratio to 10 8 . The proposed Pi-Nanotube transistors architecture is superior in terms of SCEs like threshold voltage roll-off, also low drain bias sensitivity of the leakage current.…”
mentioning
confidence: 76%
“…Extra core gate limits the scalability of Nanotube Junctionless FETs regardless of their eventual electrostatic gate control as a result, a symmetric intrinsic pocketed Pi NT JLFET with small inherent pockets at both the sides of the channel has a lower L-BTBT, resulting lateral parasitic bipolar junction transistor activity in the upcoming nanotubes. This device structure has been proposed by Jain et al 35 As observed through simulations, for a gate length of 20 nm, addition of an intrinsic pocket minimises the OFF current in the Pi-NT-JLFET by about two orders of magnitude, resulting in a significant I ON /I OFF ratio to 10 8 . The proposed Pi-Nanotube transistors architecture is superior in terms of SCEs like threshold voltage roll-off, also low drain bias sensitivity of the leakage current.…”
mentioning
confidence: 76%
“…The wafer bonding is followed by the two-phase heat treatment. During first heat treatment at ~ 400-600°C, the implanted wafer A splits along the H-rich zone giving rise to an SOI wafer with an incorporated ground plane ( used [23], which is a well-established TCAD model and has been extensively used to investigate the ambipolar tunneling leakage mechanisms in TFETs [15], and lateral band-to-band-tunneling in SOI-JLFETs [5], nanowire JLFETs [24] and nanotube JLFETs [25]. Furthermore, we have not invoked any direct tunneling model to account for gate leakage through the gate dielectric in our simulations as also done in the previously reported works on SOI-JLFETs [5], [16].…”
Section: Device Structure and Simulation Parametersmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We have also compared the performance of the proposed GP-JLFET with the emerging 3D-FET architectures as shown in Table II. The comparison shows that the normalized OFF-state current of the GP-JLFET and ION/IOFF ratio is relatively better compared to the emerging complex 3-D device architectures such as conventional gate all around nanowire (NW) JLFETs [24] as well as core -shell nanotube (NT) JLFETs [25] for an active silicon device layer thickness (t Si ) of 10 nm. Thus, our proposed device shows a comparatively improved OFF-state JLFET with spacers [30] 20 nm ~ 10 -10 ~10 7…”
Section: Scalability Analysis Of Gp-jlfetmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Investigation also reports that JL-FETs are more sensitive to RDF than IM-FETs in baseline doping levels in silicon-bulk channel [15]. In rencent years, many novel junctionless architectures have been published in reputed journals, like Nanowire junctionless FETs and Nano tube junctionless FETs [16][17]. Therefore, electrical properties variability of conventional JL-FETs induced by RDF is going to be a worthwhile concern when the device scales to the nanometer region with the total number of dopant atoms increasingly discretized.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%