2017
DOI: 10.11646/zootaxa.4290.3.5
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Intrapopulational variation in color pattern of Trichomycterus davisi (Haseman, 1911) (Siluriformes: Trichomycteridae) corroborated by morphometrics and molecular analysis

Abstract: Color patterns of the body are commonly used to distinguish and identify species of Trichomycterus. Therefore, variation in color pattern in a population can cause doubt concerning species identification. With the purpose to test the hypothesis of high variation in color pattern of Trichomycterus davisi (Haseman, 1911), 118 specimens were collected in a stream of a private Ecological Park in southern Brazil, of which 88 were used in the morphological analysis and 30 for DNA barcoding analysis. Three phenotypic… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

2
18
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(20 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
2
18
0
Order By: Relevance
“…It is worth noting that these species have very similar morphology and that color patterns of the body are commonly used to distinguish and identify species. However, Nascimento et al (2017) verified ontogenetic variation of color pattern in T. davisi. Thereby, variation in color pattern within a population can cause doubt concerning species identification.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 88%
“…It is worth noting that these species have very similar morphology and that color patterns of the body are commonly used to distinguish and identify species. However, Nascimento et al (2017) verified ontogenetic variation of color pattern in T. davisi. Thereby, variation in color pattern within a population can cause doubt concerning species identification.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 88%
“…Morphometric data were taken point to point with digital callipers (precision of 0.1 mm) on the left side of specimens following Nascimento et al . (). For osteological analysis, two specimens were cleared and stained (c&s) prepared according to Taylor and van Dyke ().…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…The specimens used for the morphological measurements are paratypes and holotype and the specimens in alcohol are non‐types. Furthermore, sequences of other Cambeva species obtained from the Upper Rio Paraná and Laguna dos Patos systems, Rio Iguaçu, Rio São Francisco, Rio Uruguay and Atlantic coastal basins were added to the analysis to investigate the possible relationship between C. cubataonis (Katz et al ., ), C. davisi (Nascimento et al ., ; Ochoa et al ., ), C. diabola (Pereira et al ., ), C. iheringi (Ochoa et al ., ; Pereira et al ., ), C. pascuali (Ochoa et al ., ), Cambeva diatropoporos (Ferrer & Malabarba 2013), Cambeva perkos (Datovo, Carvalho & Ferrer 2012), C. poikilos , C. variegata (Ochoa et al ., ) and the new species. All sequences used in this study and haplotypes are described in Table S1 in Appendix S1.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 98%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…All species examined and incorporated in the molecular analysis (voucher specimens) were identified or validated by comparing with type specimens, original descriptions (i.e., Ardila Rodríguez, 2016, 2018; Barbosa & Costa, 2010;Fernandez & Chuquihuamaní, 2007;Fernández & Miranda, 2007;Fernández & Vari, 2009;García-Melo et al, 2016;Lezama et al, 2012) and other works with informative data (i.e., Bizerril, 1994;Datovo et al, 2012;Donin, 2019;Eigenmann, 1918;Ferrer & Malabarba, 2011Nascimento et al, 2017;Terán et al, 2017;Wosiacki, 2005;Wosiacki & Garavello, 2004;Wosiacki & Oyakawa, 2005), except for the genetic sequences available in GenBank obtained by Nascimento et al (2017)***, Ochoa et al (2017aOchoa et al ( , 2017b)* and Pereira et al (2011)**. In these cases, the taxonomic identifications provided by the respective author(s) were adopted and their authorship along the text and in the phylogenetic tree was annotated using asterisks (see earlier).…”
Section: Samples and Comparative Materialsmentioning
confidence: 99%