1992
DOI: 10.21236/ada261259
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Interpupillary and Vertex Distance Effects on Field-of-View and Acuity With ANVIS

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

1997
1997
1998
1998

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 4 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The mechanical range of adjustments have typically been based on the 1" to 99" percentile male user. Each mechanical misadjustment affects some visual characteristic, but the adjustments are interrelated (Ring and Morse, 1992;McLean et al, 1997). For example, with the nonpupil forming ANVIS, when the fore-aft adjustment is set exactly at the optimum sighting alignment point (OSAP) which is the maximum viewing distance that provides a full FOV, increasing the fore-aft distance from the eye along the optical axis proportionally decreases the ANVIS FOV 132 (Kotulak, 1992;McLean, 1995).…”
Section: Mechanical Adjustmentsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The mechanical range of adjustments have typically been based on the 1" to 99" percentile male user. Each mechanical misadjustment affects some visual characteristic, but the adjustments are interrelated (Ring and Morse, 1992;McLean et al, 1997). For example, with the nonpupil forming ANVIS, when the fore-aft adjustment is set exactly at the optimum sighting alignment point (OSAP) which is the maximum viewing distance that provides a full FOV, increasing the fore-aft distance from the eye along the optical axis proportionally decreases the ANVIS FOV 132 (Kotulak, 1992;McLean, 1995).…”
Section: Mechanical Adjustmentsmentioning
confidence: 99%