2012
DOI: 10.3182/20120523-3-ro-2023.00348
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Interoperability Assessment in the Deployment of Technical Processes in Industry

Abstract: Increasing competition on markets induces a vital need for companies to improve their efficiency and reactivity. For this, a solution is to deploy, improve and manage their processes while paying a special attention on the abilities of the resources involved. Particularly, the interoperability of the latter is considered in this article as a challenge conditioning the success of the deployment. Consequently, this paper presents a mean to assess interoperability of the resources involved in a process during all… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
2
2
1
1

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 4 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Personal Health Systems (PHS), an interoperability framework, considers human aspects in addition to technical ones, in line with the interoperability concept propounded by [23] and later reinforced by [24]. The PHS is divided into two structures: execution and technical aspects; legal and organizational aspects [25].…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Personal Health Systems (PHS), an interoperability framework, considers human aspects in addition to technical ones, in line with the interoperability concept propounded by [23] and later reinforced by [24]. The PHS is divided into two structures: execution and technical aspects; legal and organizational aspects [25].…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, HC treatment outcomes tightly depend on human variants facing the need for multidisciplinarity: the variability of each case, the individuality of each patient, and the physicians' individual experiences influence medical decisions [2]. Following this, [23] proposed another model, which divides interoperability into human, non-human, and heterogeneous systems, and then evaluates overall enterprise interoperability. Thus, these authors highlighted human systems for the academic community inclined toward interoperability.…”
Section: Enterprise Interoperability In Healthcarementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Military [16], [40], [41], [42], [43], [44], [45], [46], [47], [48], [49], [50], [51], [52], [53], [54] Industry [18], [19], [20], [23], [33], [34], [36], [55], [56], [57], [58], [59], [60], [61], [62], [63], [64], [65], [66], [67], [68], [69], [70], [71], [72], [73], [74], [75], [76], [77], [78], [79], [80], [81], [82]…”
Section: Domain Referencementioning
confidence: 99%
“…The authors in [23], [80] propose a methodology for INAS regarding the deployment of collaborative processes. This methodology allows the concerned enterprises to select between the Potentiality and Compatibility assessment for evaluating the interoperability between two Entities.…”
Section: Approach A21: Customizable Interoperability Assessment Methomentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Indeed, SE is an interdisciplinary approach that implies a huge number of interactions between people, technologies and processes [7]. So, we assume that interoperability of all resources involved or that could be involved in the future processes to deploy is a key factor in the deployment of SE processes that must be considered and appraised [8] during the preparation of the deployment.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%