International Entrepreneurship research (1989–2009): A domain ontology and thematic analysis

Beyond categorization: New directions for theory development about entrepreneurial internationalization

“…Their pervasive presence in academic journals, teaching material and policy reports attests to their value in this regard, as does their prominence in recent reviews of the domain (e.g., Jones, Coviello, & Tang, 2011;Knight & Liesch, 2016). However, we believe that theory development in this area has not grown commensurately.…”

Instant Internationalization of Emerging Economy New Ventures: The Evidence of a Family-Owned Venture from Moldova

“…This theory-building study makes an attempt to contribute to international entrepreneurship research field that is fragmented and suffers from theoretical paucity (Jones, Coviello and Tang, 2011) and from a coverage bias (Turcan, Mäkelä, Sørensen and Rönkkö, 2010) that focuses mostly on high-tech INVs from developed economies (Yamakawa, Peng and Deeds, 2008) and that needs to borrow more actively from other disciplines in order for IE theory to evolve (Turcan, Mäkelä, Sørensen and Rönkkö, 2010). In this endeavor, the study, drawing from institutional theory, has explored the process of internationalization of new, familyowned ventures from emerging economies.…”

“…In line with a theory-building research design, this paper adopts a singlecase study strategy and relies on intensity sampling, the logic and power of which lie in purposefully selecting information-rich cases that manifest the phenomenon intensely, but not extremely (Miles and Huberman, 1994). 1 For review of IE research, please refer, e.g., to Jones, Coviello and Tang (2011), Kraus (2011), Coombs, Sadrieh and Annavarjula (2009), Keupp and Gassmann (2009), Rialp, Rialp and Knight (2005), and Coviello and Jones (2004). 2 For review of internationalization of family-owned ventures in IE research, please refer to Casillas, Acedo and Moreno (2007) and Kontinen and Ojala (2010).…”

Policy learning and policy change: learning from research citations

“…First, the focus has been on peer-reviewed journals because these are regarded as confirmed knowledge (Podsakoff et al 2005). The exclusion of books and book chapters is due to variations in the peer review processes (Jones et al 2011). Second, articles selected had 'policy learning' and 'policy change' as the topic (i.e.…”