2017
DOI: 10.1057/s41267-017-0070-3
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Beyond categorization: New directions for theory development about entrepreneurial internationalization

Abstract: Categorizations emphasizing the earliness of internationalization have long been a cornerstone of international entrepreneurship research. Here we contend that the prominence of categories has not been commensurate with theory development associated with them. We draw on categorization theory to explain why earliness-based categories are persistent, and argue that a greater focus on notions related to opportunity can open new avenues of research about the entrepreneurial internationalization of business. We pr… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

3
112
0
2

Year Published

2018
2018
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
4
3

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 109 publications
(120 citation statements)
references
References 117 publications
(115 reference statements)
3
112
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…The literature examines internationalization speed mainly in three dimensions (Kuivalainen, Sundqvist, & Servais, 2007), namely earliness of initial foreign entry or post-entry expansion pace (Li, Qian, & Qian, 2015;Reuber, Dimitratos, & Kuivalainen, 2017;Sapienza, Autio, George, & Zahra, 2006), scope of country (Hashai, 2011;Vermeulen & Barkema, 2002), and intensity of foreign commitment (Li, Qian, & Qian, 2012;Oviatt & McDougall, 2005). The first dimension (timing) is essential (Rahaman, 2016), as it has become a common practice to define INVs if they start international business within 6 years of inception (Coviello, 2015;Deng, Jean, & Sinkovics, 2017).…”
Section: Internationalization Speed Invs and Performancementioning
confidence: 99%
“…The literature examines internationalization speed mainly in three dimensions (Kuivalainen, Sundqvist, & Servais, 2007), namely earliness of initial foreign entry or post-entry expansion pace (Li, Qian, & Qian, 2015;Reuber, Dimitratos, & Kuivalainen, 2017;Sapienza, Autio, George, & Zahra, 2006), scope of country (Hashai, 2011;Vermeulen & Barkema, 2002), and intensity of foreign commitment (Li, Qian, & Qian, 2012;Oviatt & McDougall, 2005). The first dimension (timing) is essential (Rahaman, 2016), as it has become a common practice to define INVs if they start international business within 6 years of inception (Coviello, 2015;Deng, Jean, & Sinkovics, 2017).…”
Section: Internationalization Speed Invs and Performancementioning
confidence: 99%
“…For entries in new markets with a great disparity in characteristics, the probability of success depends most on the capabilities and resources of the particular firm (Barney, 1991). Vice versa, internationalization may risk an export firms' destabilization (Reuber, Dimitratos and Kuivalainen, 2017). This risk is currently often cast aside in Chile, where many firms "blindly" follow the example of others to new and more distant markets such as Middle East & Africa and Far East & South Pacific, even when those others are endowed with more appropriate capabilities and resources.…”
Section: Conclusion and Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Finally, the high share of firms switching between categories/subcategories one or more times forwards and/or backwards, plus the number of firms changing internationalization pathways over the years indicate the very high dynamism of internationalization in the Chilean fruit export sector. Hence, internationalization cannot be considered a one-off management goal or a status but rather a dynamic process in which firms are constantly changing their strategy (Reuber, Dimitratos and Kuivalainen, 2017). In this regard, policymakers and trade facilitation agencies in the Chilean fruit sector must focus not only on helping firms to become internationalized but also on offering more flexible and adaptable services and training to prepare them to maintain their presence in international markets over time.…”
Section: Conclusion and Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations