2007
DOI: 10.2337/dc06-1598
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Interindividual Variability and Intra-Individual Reproducibility of Glycemic Index Values for Commercial White Bread

Abstract: OBJECTIVE -We sought to assess the intra-and interindividual variability of glycemic index value determinations for white bread using glucose as the reference food.RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS -A total of 23 healthy adults (aged 20 -70 years) completed up to three sets of two visits per set. Each pair of visits assessed the glycemic response to 50 g available carbohydrates from commercial white bread and glucose, administered in random order. Glycemic index values were calculated by dividing the 2-h incremental… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

12
82
1

Year Published

2007
2007
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
8
1
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 133 publications
(95 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
12
82
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The authors suggest that the high degree of variability in glycemic response means that GI is unlikely to be a good method to inform food choices. This high degree of variability has also been shown in individuals with type 2 diabetes [87].…”
Section: Replacement Of Sfa With N-3 Pufamentioning
confidence: 76%
“…The authors suggest that the high degree of variability in glycemic response means that GI is unlikely to be a good method to inform food choices. This high degree of variability has also been shown in individuals with type 2 diabetes [87].…”
Section: Replacement Of Sfa With N-3 Pufamentioning
confidence: 76%
“…This view is supported by results from a separate study of the in vitro digestion of eighty-three foods, in which relative GD rates from the present study gave values for net GGE in vitro that predicted GGE in vivo as accurately as in the present study (26) . Because the GD rates, being a function of GGE intake, were based on responses relative to glucose they should be largely immune to effects of individual fluctuations within groups, which introduce enormous variability into clinical determinations of glycaemic response (27,28) . Nonetheless, as the range of foods used in the present study was small, and experimental groups are likely to differ in insulin sensitivity, further research is required to firmly establish that relative GD rates are universally applicable and may be used to provide the same GGE values for foods in different population groups.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Moreover, inter-individual and intra-individual variations (Vega-López et al, 2007), the placebo effect (Sievenpiper et al, 2007), and several other factors (FosterPowell, Holt, Brand-Miller, 2002;Wolever et al, 2009) that can influence such results must be taken into consideration. In this context, using rats whose blood had been analyzed using a standardized methodology provides many advantages.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%