Inter-rater reliability and validity of angle measurements using smartphone applications for weight-bearing ankle dorsiflexion range of motion measurements

Awatani, Takenori; Enoki, Taisuke; Morikita, Ikuhiro

doi:10.1016/j.ptsp.2018.09.002

Cited by 8 publications

(2 citation statements)

References 31 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…Sixteen professional soccer players (age: 26.33 ± 4.10 years old; height: 179.22 ± 5.66 cm; weight: 75.56 ± 7.36 kg) from a team competing in LaLiga were evaluated. The sample size was estimated a priori with a statistical power above 0.8 and was of similar size to previous studies [13,27]. All participants were informed of the nature of the study and signed informed consent.…”

Section: Participantsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Validity and Reliability of an Inertial Device for Measuring Dynamic Weight-Bearing Ankle Dorsiflexion

Oliva-Lozano

Martín-Fuentes

Muyor

2020

Sensors

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

A decrease in ankle dorsiflexion causes changes in biomechanics, and different instruments have been used for ankle dorsiflexion testing under static conditions. Consequently, the industry of inertial sensors has developed easy-to-use devices, which measure dynamic ankle dorsiflexion and provide additional parameters such as velocity, acceleration, or movement deviation. Therefore, the aims of this study were to analyze the concurrent validity and test-retest reliability of an inertial device for measuring dynamic weight-bearing ankle dorsiflexion. Sixteen participants were tested using an inertial device (WIMU) and a digital inclinometer. Ankle dorsiflexion from left and right ankle repetitions was used for validity analysis, whereas test-retest reliability was analyzed by comparing measurements from the first and second days. The standard error of the measurement (SEM) between the instruments was very low for both ankle measurements (SEM < 0.6°). No significant differences between instruments were found for the left ankle measurement (p > 0.05) even though a significant systematic bias (~1.77°) was found for the right ankle (d = 0.79). R2 was very close to 1 in the left and right ankles (R2 = 0.85–0.89) as well as the intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC > 0.95). Test-retest reliability analysis showed that systematic bias was below 1° for both instruments, even though a systematic bias (~1.50°) with small effect size was found in the right ankle (d = 0.49) with WIMU. The ICC was very close to 1 and the coefficient of variation (CV) was lower than 4% in both instruments. Thus, WIMU is a valid and reliable inertial device for measuring dynamic weight-bearing ankle dorsiflexion.

show abstract

Section: Participantsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Validity and Reliability of an Inertial Device for Measuring Dynamic Weight-Bearing Ankle Dorsiflexion

Oliva-Lozano

Martín-Fuentes

Muyor

2020

Sensors

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…11 Were appropriate statistical measures of agreement used? 足関節 7 件 43,[45][46][47][48][49][50] ，肩関節 7 件 [51][52][53][54][55][56][57] ，股関節 5 件 [58][59][60][61][62] ，前腕 5 件 [63][64][65][66][67] ，肘関節 4 件 63,65,66,68) ，手関節 4 件 68-71) 33,35,36) ，ヘルメット上部に SG を固定する方法が 2 件 9,29) ，ベルトやテープで頭部に SG を固定する方法が 3 件 30,32,34) ，VR ゴーグル 31) を使用する方法があった．膝関節では徒手が 6 件 [37][38][39][40][41]44) 53,57) ，アームバンドでの固定が 3 件 51,54,56) ，写真が 3 件 52,55,56) あった．股関節は，徒手が 2 件 60,62) ，ベルトを大腿部に固定した研究が 3 件 58,59,61) あった．肘関節，前腕，手関節では，徒手が 7 件 [63][64]…”

unclassified

Smartphone Application Measurement Methods and Their Validity and Reliability of Joint Range of Motion Measurements: A Systematic Review

Takeda¹,

Nakayama²,

Furukawa³

2022

Rigakuryoho kagaku

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

To conduct a systematic review of smartphone application measurement methods, and their validity and reliability of joint range of motion (SG) measurements. [Participants and Methods] The PubMed, Cochrane and medical databases were searched, and studies meeting the eligibility criteria were qualitatively analyzed using the Quality Appraisal of Reliability Studies (QAREL) to confirm their quality. [Results] Out of the 612 studies retrieved, 57 studies met the eligibility criteria. The quality of the studies was moderate. Thirty-seven studies used manual fixation, 16 armband fixing, and 8 image sensor-based methods. There were no studies in which all joints were measured with a single application. [Conclusion] It was clear that methodologies differed between studies even when the same application was used.

show abstract

Physical outcome measures: The role of strength and range of motion in orthopaedic research

Marcano-Fernández

Prada

Johal

2020

Injury

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Inter-rater reliability and validity of angle measurements using smartphone applications for weight-bearing ankle dorsiflexion range of motion measurements

Cited by 8 publications

References 31 publications

Validity and Reliability of an Inertial Device for Measuring Dynamic Weight-Bearing Ankle Dorsiflexion

Validity and Reliability of an Inertial Device for Measuring Dynamic Weight-Bearing Ankle Dorsiflexion

Smartphone Application Measurement Methods and Their Validity and Reliability of Joint Range of Motion Measurements: A Systematic Review

Physical outcome measures: The role of strength and range of motion in orthopaedic research

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About