2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.injury.2019.11.017
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Physical outcome measures: The role of strength and range of motion in orthopaedic research

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2

Citation Types

0
3
0
1

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
0
3
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Clinical outcome measures included pain assessed with a visual analog scale (VAS; 0 points for no pain and 10 points for maximum pain) and sagittal ankle ROM measured according to a previously published protocol using a goniometer applied along the lateral border of the leg and foot. 4,12,14,15 To avoid bias, these parameters were assessed by research associates who were otherwise not involved in any clinical duties. Research associates were regularly trained by board-certified foot and ankle surgeons to ensure adequate angular measurements.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Clinical outcome measures included pain assessed with a visual analog scale (VAS; 0 points for no pain and 10 points for maximum pain) and sagittal ankle ROM measured according to a previously published protocol using a goniometer applied along the lateral border of the leg and foot. 4,12,14,15 To avoid bias, these parameters were assessed by research associates who were otherwise not involved in any clinical duties. Research associates were regularly trained by board-certified foot and ankle surgeons to ensure adequate angular measurements.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although some authors report similarity between clinical measurements in the literature, 13 in our study, measurement with the traditional goniometer was inaccurate to determine the true amplitude of the leg-foot movement. Marcano-Fernandez et al 14 commented that the traditional goniometer, although widely used in orthopedics, leads to many measurement errors, and has low reliability. Russell et al, 12 evaluating ankle mobility in dancers, found different results comparing the traditional goniometer and the inclinometer.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Apesar de alguns autores relatarem semelhança entre as mensurações clínicas na literatura, 13 no nosso estudo a mensuração com o goniômetro tradicional se mostrou imprecisa para medir a verdadeira amplitude do movimento perna-pé. Marcano-Fernandez et al 14 comentaram que o goniômetro tradicional, apesar de amplamente utilizado na ortopedia, leva a muitos erros de medida e tem baixa confiabilidade. Russel et al, 12 avaliando a mobilidade do tornozelo em bailarinas, encontraram resultados diferentes comparando o goniômetro tradicional e o inclinômetro.…”
Section: Discussionunclassified
“…10 In addition, the ankle range of motion (ROM) was measured according to a standardized protocol using a goniometer applied along the lateral border of the leg and foot under load application. 7,25,26 To avoid bias, these parameters were assessed by research associates who were otherwise not involved in any clinical duties. Research associates were regularly trained by board-certified foot and ankle surgeons to ensure adequate angular measurements.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%