Intensity, intent, and ambiguity: Appraisals of workplace ostracism and coping responses

Abstract

General rightsCopyright and moral rights for the publications made accessible in the public portal are retained by the authors and/or other copyright owners and it is a condition of accessing publications that users recognise and abide by the legal requirements associated with these rights.• Users may download and print one copy of any publication from the public portal for the purpose of private study or research. • You may not further distribute the material or use it for any profit-making activity or commercial gain • You may freely distribute the URL identifying the publication in the public portal Take down policyIf you believe that this document breaches copyright please contact us providing details, and we will remove access to the work immediately and investigate your claim.

Dynamic and Multi-Party Approaches to Interpersonal Workplace Mistreatment Research

“…that can replace more aggressive responses such as retaliation. While there has been an increasing number of studies that look at people’s coping strategies and how they relate to workplace mistreatment (e.g., Cortina & Magley, 2009; Meral et al, 2022; Salin et al, 2014; Vranjes et al, 2021, 2022; Wang & Wang, 2017), these studies have generally focused on between-person differences in coping strategies and thus have adopted a trait-like approach to coping as an individual difference variable. Yet, people apply a variety of coping strategies throughout a day (Tennen et al, 2000), and have been found to alter their coping strategies based on how successful these strategies are in helping them mitigate their daily stressors (Blaxton & Bergeman, 2017).…”