2001
DOI: 10.1590/s1516-35982001000700001
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Influência da Temperatura Ambiente no Desempenho da Rã-touro, Rana catesbeiana (Shaw, 1802) na Fase de Recria

Abstract: IntroduçãoA rã-touro, Rana catesbeiana (Shaw, 1802), assim como todos os anfíbios, é um animal ectotérmico, ou seja, seu metabolismo está inteiramente dependente da temperatura ambiente. Esta característica influi grandemente na produção comercial, pois, quando a alimentação e a nutrição ocorrem numa faixa de temperatura ótima, ocorre maior consumo de alimento por parte dos animais, possibilitando maior ganho de peso em menor espaço de tempo, que é o principal objetivo de uma criação zootécnica.Segundo DUELLMA… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
15
1
11

Year Published

2012
2012
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 25 publications
(27 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
(7 reference statements)
0
15
1
11
Order By: Relevance
“…Regarding the weight range of frogs in pens 5 and 6 of the present study, whose initial weight was 65.95 and 110.84, and a final weight of 123.92 and 155 grams, the feed conversion ratio was higher than that found by the above cited authors, respectively, 1.07: 1 and 1.1: 1; this is despite the negative factor relative to the mean water temperature, i.e., during the experiment, the mean temperature was 22.8 ºC. Braga and Lima (2001) verified the values of the feed conversion ratio between 1.40: 1 and 1.46: 1, with temperatures between 20 and 30 ºC, for 35 days of the study, and for frogs with an initial mean weight of 37.5 grams and final mean weight of 83.5 grams. The worst conversion in this study was verified for the frogs from pen 4, which at the beginning of monitoring had a mean weight of 335.70 grams a weight above the standard of animals for slaughter.…”
Section: Performance Of the Bullfrog (Lithobathes Catesbeianus) Rearecontrasting
confidence: 73%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…Regarding the weight range of frogs in pens 5 and 6 of the present study, whose initial weight was 65.95 and 110.84, and a final weight of 123.92 and 155 grams, the feed conversion ratio was higher than that found by the above cited authors, respectively, 1.07: 1 and 1.1: 1; this is despite the negative factor relative to the mean water temperature, i.e., during the experiment, the mean temperature was 22.8 ºC. Braga and Lima (2001) verified the values of the feed conversion ratio between 1.40: 1 and 1.46: 1, with temperatures between 20 and 30 ºC, for 35 days of the study, and for frogs with an initial mean weight of 37.5 grams and final mean weight of 83.5 grams. The worst conversion in this study was verified for the frogs from pen 4, which at the beginning of monitoring had a mean weight of 335.70 grams a weight above the standard of animals for slaughter.…”
Section: Performance Of the Bullfrog (Lithobathes Catesbeianus) Rearecontrasting
confidence: 73%
“…Figueiredo et al (1999) stated optimum values as those between 27.6 and 30.1 ºC. Braga and Lima (2001) observed better performances between 25 and 30 ºC.…”
Section: Results Of Daily Monitoring the Ph Temperature Total Ammonmentioning
confidence: 94%
See 3 more Smart Citations