2015
DOI: 10.19182/bft2015.325.a31271
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Influence of Tree Cover on Diversity, Carbon Sequestration and Productivity of Cocoa Systems in the Ecuadorian Amazon

Abstract: Influence of tree cover on diversity, carbon sequestration and productivity of cocoa systems in the Ecuadorian AmazonB o i s e t f o r ê t s d e s t r o p i q u e s , 2 0 1 5 , n° 3 2 5 ( 3 ) diversité, stoCK de CArBone et produCtivité des CACAoYÈres 35 B o i s e t f o r ê t s d e s t r o p i q u e s , 2 0 1 5 , n° 3 2 5 ( 3 ) diVersitY, CArBon stoCK And CoCoA sYsteMs produCtiVitY 36 RÉSUMÉ INFLUENCE DU COUVERT FORESTIER SUR LA DIVERSITÉ, LES STOCKS DE CARBONE ET LA PRODUCTIVITÉ DES CACAOYÈRES DANS LA RÉGION A… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
8
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
(19 reference statements)
3
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For most migrant settlers and some Kichwa populations in the SBR, the agricultural systems are made up mainly of cash crops, such as pasture for cattle ( Figure 2), cocoa (Theobroma cacao L.), coffee (Coffea canephora Pierre ex A. Froehner), maize (Zea mays L.) and naranjilla (Solanum quitoense Lam. ), in addition to staple crops, such as yucca (Manihot esculenta Crantz), plantain (Musa paradisiaca L.) and peach palm (Bactris gasipaes Kunth) [48][49][50][51]. These trends are fairly similar to those found in the northern Ecuadorian Amazon Region [37,39,41] and by Vasco et al [52] and Lerner et al [53] in the central and southern Ecuadorian Amazon Region, respectively.…”
Section: Study Area and Agricultural Contextssupporting
confidence: 70%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…For most migrant settlers and some Kichwa populations in the SBR, the agricultural systems are made up mainly of cash crops, such as pasture for cattle ( Figure 2), cocoa (Theobroma cacao L.), coffee (Coffea canephora Pierre ex A. Froehner), maize (Zea mays L.) and naranjilla (Solanum quitoense Lam. ), in addition to staple crops, such as yucca (Manihot esculenta Crantz), plantain (Musa paradisiaca L.) and peach palm (Bactris gasipaes Kunth) [48][49][50][51]. These trends are fairly similar to those found in the northern Ecuadorian Amazon Region [37,39,41] and by Vasco et al [52] and Lerner et al [53] in the central and southern Ecuadorian Amazon Region, respectively.…”
Section: Study Area and Agricultural Contextssupporting
confidence: 70%
“…This is because chakra provides a plethora of ecosystem services [87] and is, characterized by having a high number of timber-yielding and fruit trees [48,51,56,57,75], edible and medicinal plants [51,54], leaf litter restoration and a minimization process of water erosion compared to monocultures and pastures [70]. Thus, the chakra system is an example of the use of sustainable production to combat biodiversity loss and climate change for small-scale farmers [48,49,51]. This is especially true for the Crop-based LS and Forest-based LS, which have between 80% and 56% in crop areas, respectively.…”
Section: Policy Implication For More Sustainable Production Systemsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We measured the diversity of cocoa agroforests in the Bengamisa-Yangambi forest landscape by evaluating base on the following: (i) species diversity (species richness, Shannon-Wiener index, Piélou's evenness index, Simpson's index, rarefaction curve); (ii) relative abundance; (iii) structure (density and basal area); and (iv) linkage between density and biodiversity. Each of these parameters is generally used in the characterization of cocoa agroforest in other countries [15,40,41,[43][44][45][46][47] and for the characterization of forest stands [29,48,49].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…especially in cases 1W and 2W and of similar dynamics in the Atmosphere theme. In case 1W of Tobeta Indigenous Community, its classification is limited in the subject of Biodiversity and can be considered by the number of species existing in the productive system compared to an agroforestry system of the Kichwa nationality where there is a lush number of species [58], [59], [60], but it is essential to mention that the 1W case has the area of greatest sustainability surface in relation to its peers evaluated ( Table 3). The issues of Animal Welfare and Investment in all three cases are considered as Limited, since culturally the raising of animals in the Waorani nationality is not within their ancestral cultural dynamics despite a possession of minor species and the investment is minimal due to the influence of additional income that promotes greater family or individual welfare as paid work.…”
Section: General Discussion With the Lacing Algorithm Ormentioning
confidence: 99%