1997
DOI: 10.1116/1.580428
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Influence of strain on semiconductor thin film epitaxy

Abstract: Under typical growth conditions, strain levels greater than or equal to 10−4 are shown to influence thin film surface morphology and strain relaxation pathways. Misfit and threading dislocations in relaxed heterostructures produce long wavelength undulations on the surface and shallow depressions, respectively. Threading dislocation densities greater than ∼105–106 cm−2 in relaxed heterostructures must be due to increased impediments to dislocation motion, which in turn originate from the effect of the misfit d… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
27
0

Year Published

1999
1999
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 72 publications
(29 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
2
27
0
Order By: Relevance
“…1. The absence of a cross-hatch pattern, which is commonly observed on the surface of a relaxed or partially relaxed SiGe layer on a bulk Si substrate because of misfit dislocations [15], indicates that the strain in SiGe layer is relaxed without generating dislocations in the oxidation process. The root-mean-square roughness for the 1-h oxidized sample surface is estimated to be 1.5 nm, and that is 1.3 nm for the 2-h one.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…1. The absence of a cross-hatch pattern, which is commonly observed on the surface of a relaxed or partially relaxed SiGe layer on a bulk Si substrate because of misfit dislocations [15], indicates that the strain in SiGe layer is relaxed without generating dislocations in the oxidation process. The root-mean-square roughness for the 1-h oxidized sample surface is estimated to be 1.5 nm, and that is 1.3 nm for the 2-h one.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…2(b)), which has slight diffraction contrast in the cap indicative of the onset of phase separation, but is otherwise clean and free of any sign of threads, supports this observation. AFM measurements on 40 Â 40 mm and 1 Â 1 mm areas showed the root-mean-squared (RMS) roughness of the wafer surface to be 13.0 nm and 1.6 nm, respectively, with the former value attributable to the growth rate variations that result from strain fields around the misfit dislocations that form along the /0 1 1S directions (the so-called ''cross-hatch'') [21]. This is suitable for most device applications, and chemomechanical polishing (CMP) can be employed if necessary to further smooth the surface.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It has been shown that the strain field around dislocations in the SiGe material system can lead to changes in the surface. During epitaxy, this will result in a crosshatch surface morphology representative of the dislocation network [20]. The sample with no evidence of subsurface damage (sample B) was much smoother as seen in Fig.…”
Section: Homoepitaxial Growthmentioning
confidence: 94%