2010
DOI: 10.1016/j.nantod.2010.01.001
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Influence of nanoscale surface topography on protein adsorption and cellular response

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

8
397
0
9

Year Published

2011
2011
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 527 publications
(414 citation statements)
references
References 105 publications
8
397
0
9
Order By: Relevance
“…An improvement and acceleration of the healing after surgical intervention would cause a tremendous enhancement of life quality. Therefore, finding optimized functional materials that are able to attract or repel specific molecules is recently in a strong focus of life sciences [4][5][6]. Thus, the question arises how one can improve and modify the interface between a specific material and its biological surrounding by subsequent physical treatments, e.g.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…An improvement and acceleration of the healing after surgical intervention would cause a tremendous enhancement of life quality. Therefore, finding optimized functional materials that are able to attract or repel specific molecules is recently in a strong focus of life sciences [4][5][6]. Thus, the question arises how one can improve and modify the interface between a specific material and its biological surrounding by subsequent physical treatments, e.g.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The confirmation, orientation, and quantity of proteins adsorbed are influenced by the surface features, roughness, and oxidation state of the polymers. 35,36 The alignment of PEDOT domains in the matrix of PSS and generation of local defect patterns result in the formation of regions exhibiting variability in the surface potential and conductivity which modulates the overall distribution of proteins adsorbed on the CP substrates. The modulation of cell adhesion results in the variation of traction forces which the cells perceive from the substrate and it leads to the changes in the actin based cytoskeletal assembly.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…33,34 The surface charge on the substrate can alter the recruitment of proteins, which in turn influences the formation of focal adhesion complexes and lead to changes in the downstream signaling events. 35,36 We show that a subtle and controlled method of modifying the polymer surface is achieved by stretching. A careful study of cell differentiation on surfaces which have different degrees of strain provides a clear demonstration of the substrate effect.…”
mentioning
confidence: 95%
“…Ti thin films exhibited the highest surface roughness after the 20 min in contact with the serum. It is reported that nanoscale surface could affect protein adsorption and conformation [9], while surface roughness between 2 and 21 nm would not alter protein adsorption amount [10]. Although the surface roughness of the three materials was different, they were all below 6 nm and could be neglected.…”
Section: Contact Angle Measurementsmentioning
confidence: 99%