2005
DOI: 10.1016/j.jtbi.2004.12.023
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Influence of fracture gap size on the pattern of long bone healing: a computational study

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3

Citation Types

3
158
0

Year Published

2007
2007
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 164 publications
(161 citation statements)
references
References 39 publications
3
158
0
Order By: Relevance
“…bone remodelling, are here contemplated only in a simplified manner. This makes sense if one considers, first, that much effort has already been devoted to the mathematical modelling of bone remodelling (see Doblaré and García-Aznar (2005); Reina et al (2007) and references therein); second, that it is reported that in many types of bone implants most failures occur within the first year and implant loss is significantly lower in subsequent years (see, for example, Goodacre et al (1999) for the case of single unit dental implant restorations).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…bone remodelling, are here contemplated only in a simplified manner. This makes sense if one considers, first, that much effort has already been devoted to the mathematical modelling of bone remodelling (see Doblaré and García-Aznar (2005); Reina et al (2007) and references therein); second, that it is reported that in many types of bone implants most failures occur within the first year and implant loss is significantly lower in subsequent years (see, for example, Goodacre et al (1999) for the case of single unit dental implant restorations).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Other mathematical models that incorporate these effects present a more irregular distribution of bone (Gómez-Benito et al, 2005;Geris et al, 2004Geris et al, , 2008.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Different numerical models based on similar hypotheses have been proposed [e.g. 10,12,18]. Prendergast et al [43] proposed a model for mechano-regulated tissue differentiation which assumes that the regenerating tissue is a poroelastic material where the biophysical stimulus regulating differentiation is a function of tissue shear strain and the interstitial fluid flow.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Different models have been proposed which relate tissue differentiation to the mechanical environment within the mesenchymal tissue. 8,9,15,35,36 Prendergast et al 36 proposed a mechanoregulation model where the bone callus is assumed to be a poroelastic material and the stimulus regulating tissue differentiation is hypothesized to be a function of tissue shear strain and the interstitial fluid flow. This model was used to successfully predict the patterns of tissue differentiation during fracture healing 25 , at implant/bone interfaces 2,19 and during osteochondral defect repair.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%