2007
DOI: 10.1007/s11517-007-0247-1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Tissue differentiation and bone regeneration in an osteotomized mandible: a computational analysis of the latency period

Abstract: Mandibular symphyseal distraction osteogenesis is a common clinical procedure to modify the geometrical shape of the mandible for correcting problems of dental overcrowding and arch shrinkage. In spite of consolidated clinical use, questions remain concerning the optimal latency period and the influence of mastication loading on osteogenesis within the callus prior to the first distraction of the mandible. This work utilized a mechano-regulation model to assess bone regeneration within the callus of an osteoto… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
36
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
1
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 63 publications
(38 citation statements)
references
References 41 publications
2
36
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Using this mechano-regulation model (Prendergast et al, 1997), it has been possible to predict the spatial and temporal patterns of tissue differentiation during a number of regenerative events such as fracture healing Nagel and Kelly 2009), osteochondral defect repair (Kelly and Prendergast 2005;Kelly and Prendergast 2006) and distraction osteogenesis (Boccaccio et al, 2007;Boccaccio et al, 2008). However even with the use of complex computational models, it is difficult to determine how specific mechanical signals influence MSC differentiation in vivo within the milieu of other regulatory factors that are present.…”
Section: Repairmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Using this mechano-regulation model (Prendergast et al, 1997), it has been possible to predict the spatial and temporal patterns of tissue differentiation during a number of regenerative events such as fracture healing Nagel and Kelly 2009), osteochondral defect repair (Kelly and Prendergast 2005;Kelly and Prendergast 2006) and distraction osteogenesis (Boccaccio et al, 2007;Boccaccio et al, 2008). However even with the use of complex computational models, it is difficult to determine how specific mechanical signals influence MSC differentiation in vivo within the milieu of other regulatory factors that are present.…”
Section: Repairmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Both models described tissue regeneration in the chamber qualitatively, but more qualitative and quantitative experimental results are necessary to corroborate the predictive capacities of the models. Although these theories predicted some of the main aspects of tissue regeneration in fracture healing, 5,7-9 tissue engineering, 10,11 bone/implant interfaces, 6,12,13 or distraction osteogenesis, [14][15][16][17] they may be criticized for this lack of corroboration.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This modelling has been adopted in Prendergast, 2005, 2006). Boccaccio et al (Boccaccio et al, 2007(Boccaccio et al, , 2008a, modelled the cellular dispersal by using the diffusion equation (1) however, they accounted for the fact that MSCs not only require time to differentiate, but that the differentiated cell types require time to synthesise and remodel new tissue. To this purpose, based on the results of Richardson et al (Richardson et al, 1992) who observed an exponential increase in stiffness during tibial fracture healing, they assumed that the Young's modulus of all tissues within the fracture callus increases exponentially with time.…”
Section: Mechanobiology Of Mesenchymal Stem Cellsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The spreading of mesenchymal stem cells throughout the bone callus was simulated with the diffusion equation (1) (Boccaccio et al, 2008a). The diffusion coefficient D was set so that the complete cell coverage in the callus is achieved two weeks after the osteotomy.…”
Section: Determination Of the Optimal Duration Of The Latency Periodmentioning
confidence: 99%