1973
DOI: 10.1093/ee/2.5.863
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Inferences on the Dispersion of Cotton Arthropods in Texas 1

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0
1

Year Published

1976
1976
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
7
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Comparisons of the efficiency of various sampling methods in cotton have been attempted (Davis et al, 1966;Race, 1960;Sheppard and Sterling, 1972;Pieters and Sterling, 1973), but these comparisons were only partially BYC1°ly et al: Sam.pliiu; Arthropods in Cotton successful because they lacked a suitable approximation of an absolute sample to use as a standard, Leigh, Gonzalez, and van den Bosch (1971) suggested an absolute sampling method for cotton which was used by Gonzalez et ale 1977, but proved too cumbersome for practical field use. Smith, Stadelbacher, and Gautt (1976) compared four sampling methods to detect population trends of beneficial arthropods in Mississippi cotton.…”
Section: Review Of the Literaturementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Comparisons of the efficiency of various sampling methods in cotton have been attempted (Davis et al, 1966;Race, 1960;Sheppard and Sterling, 1972;Pieters and Sterling, 1973), but these comparisons were only partially BYC1°ly et al: Sam.pliiu; Arthropods in Cotton successful because they lacked a suitable approximation of an absolute sample to use as a standard, Leigh, Gonzalez, and van den Bosch (1971) suggested an absolute sampling method for cotton which was used by Gonzalez et ale 1977, but proved too cumbersome for practical field use. Smith, Stadelbacher, and Gautt (1976) compared four sampling methods to detect population trends of beneficial arthropods in Mississippi cotton.…”
Section: Review Of the Literaturementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Taylor (1984) cita que a distribuição binomial negativa caracteriza-se por apresentar a variância maior que a média ( µ σ > 2 ), sendo portanto, uma contraparte da binomial positiva. Este modelo de distribuição indica agregação ou contágio (Pieters & Sterling 1973, Southwood 1978.…”
Section: Palavras-chave: Insecta Mosca-branca Distribuição Binomialunclassified
“…The negative binomial distribution characterizes the spatial pattern of more insect species, which exhibit clumping, than any other models studied (Waters and Henson 1959;Sevacherian and Stern 1972;Pieters and Sterling 1973;Kuehl and Fye 1972;Shepard 1972; and others). The versatility of this distribution arises from the fact that it may be derived from at least five different models (Waters and Henson 1959).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…in soybeans, Waddill et al (1974) developed sequential sampling models based on distributions which were determined to fit the Poisson most often, although Geocoris spp. in cotton fields were reported to fit the negative binomial distribution significantly better than the Poisson (Pieters and Sterling 1973). Green cloverworms, Plathypena scabra (Fabricius), were found to be distributed randomly in soybean fields (Pedigo et al 1972).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 97%