2016
DOI: 10.1080/00343404.2015.1114174
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Industrial complexes in Mexico: implications for regional industrial policy based on related variety and smart specialization

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0
7

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 35 publications
0
4
0
7
Order By: Relevance
“…Some of the papers in this group deal with the identification of S3 areas. To illustrate, Gonzalez et al (2017) described and analyzed the location of industrial complexes for the construction of industrial policies based on the principles of related variety and S3. Gulc (2015) compared the methodological approaches used to identify S3 in Polish regions, concluding that the qualitative method was most popular but not complemented by the quantitative ones.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Some of the papers in this group deal with the identification of S3 areas. To illustrate, Gonzalez et al (2017) described and analyzed the location of industrial complexes for the construction of industrial policies based on the principles of related variety and S3. Gulc (2015) compared the methodological approaches used to identify S3 in Polish regions, concluding that the qualitative method was most popular but not complemented by the quantitative ones.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Based on examining and demonstrating the impact of industrial agglomeration on corporate ESG performance, the study reveals the relationship between the two and their external heterogeneity and internal micro-conduction mechanism. The study found that: (1) The agglomeration of the manufacturing significantly promotes corporate ESG performance; (2) The producer services agglomeration industries has a "U-shaped" relationship with corporate ESG performance; (3) The agglomeration of the manufacturing affects corporate ESG performance by alleviating financing constraints and improving investment levels, while the producer services agglomeration industries affects corporate ESG performance by influencing market competitiveness and internal control; (4) The impact of manufacturing agglomeration on corporate ESG performance is significant in capital-intensive and high-tech industries, while the impact of producer services agglomeration on corporate ESG performance is more significant in knowledgeintensive industries; (5) The effect of the degree of industrial agglomeration on corporate ESG performance varies according to different enterprise characteristics; (6) The agglomeration of the manufacturing mainly promotes the fulfillment of corporate environmental responsibility and social responsibility, while the producer services agglomeration primarily affects the fulfillment of corporate environmental responsibility and governance responsibility; (7) Good ESG performance has a significant positive effect on enterprises' economic, socio-economic, and governance economic consequences.…”
Section: Conclusion and Policy Implicationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Marshall (1890) defined the external effects of industrial agglomeration as the economies of scale achieved by related firms through a specialized division of labor in each production process. This effect can create a positive feedback mechanism between regional economic growth and industrial agglomeration, forming a virtuous cycle (Niklas, 2002; Beaudry and Schiffauerova, 2009; Amado and Elizabeth, 2016; Chen et al, 2022) [4][5][6][7]. Porter (1998) conducted research based on the perspective of external economy and competitive advantage and believed that industrial agglomeration could effectively reduce innovation and transaction costs of micro-subjects in a region, as well as improve the efficiency of factor utilization.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Kondisi seperti itu memberikan keuntungan jaringan yang dihasilkan oleh sinergi antara kelompok industri. Klaster industri akan berbeda ciri nya di setiap wilayah dalam satu negara sesuai dengan keberagaman wilayah yang ada (Gonzalez et al, 2017).…”
Section: P-issn 1693-3516 | E-issn 2528-7575 102unclassified