Individual wave overtopping volumes on mound breakwaters in breaking wave conditions and gentle sea bottoms

Explicit Neural Network-derived formula for overtopping flow on mound breakwaters in depth-limited breaking wave conditions

“…Regarding the model zone, good agreement was observed for Hm0 (R 2 = 0.966) while poor results were obtained for Tm-1,0 (R 2 = 0.415). As reported in Mares-Nasarre et al (2020b), decreasing values of bias were observed for Hm0 in the model zone for increasing values of hs.…”

“…Overtopping discharges were collected using a chute and a weighing system placed in a collection tank behind the model (Mares-Nasarre et al, 2020b).…”

Individual wave overtopping at coastal structures: A critical review and the existing challenges

“…) + 0.83 (14) There are also some other types of Weibull shape factor formulae e. g. [21,53,57] based on dimensionless mean overtopping discharge with the assumption that the effect of relative crest freeboard, slope angle and wave steepness exist implicitly in the mentioned parameter (see Appendix A). In the case of shallow water conditions in which the conventional formulae may give inferior results, Nørgaard et al [58]…”

Armor Damage of Overtopped Mound Breakwaters in Depth-Limited Breaking Wave Conditions

“…Two extra wave gauges were placed in the middle of the breakwater crest (S10) and behind the breakwater model (S11); S10 was used to analyze the overtopping layer thickness [31] whereas S11 was used to detect possible phenomena of water piling-up. Overtopping discharges were recorded using a weighting system located behind the model [32].…”