2009
DOI: 10.1037/a0014114
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Individual reactions to high involvement work processes: Investigating the role of empowerment and perceived organizational support.

Abstract: This study sought to understand how high involvement work processes (HIWP) are processed at the employee level. Using structural equation modeling techniques, the authors tested and supported a model in which psychological empowerment mediated the effects of HIWP on job satisfaction, organizational commitment, job performance, and job stress. Furthermore, perceived organizational support (POS) was hypothesized to moderate the relationships between empowerment and these outcomes. With exception for the empowerm… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

5
160
0
9

Year Published

2013
2013
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 155 publications
(174 citation statements)
references
References 65 publications
5
160
0
9
Order By: Relevance
“…As employees' attitudes and behavior are contingent to organizational practices, we argue for the intervening role of psychological empowerment through which employee perceived HPWS influence proactive behavior. Although the intervening role of psychological empowerment in HPWS-in-role behavior linkage is examined in prior research (e.g., Aryee, Walumbwa, Seidu, & Otaye, 2012;Butts, Vandenberg, DeJoy, Schaffer, & Wilson, 2009;Liao, Toya, Lepak, & Hong, 2009), a more detailed explanation is solicited which explore the reason for HPWS-proactive behavior linkage. We propose that psychological empowerment may explain why employees display proactive behavior in response to HPWS.…”
Section: Psychological Empowerment As a Mediatormentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As employees' attitudes and behavior are contingent to organizational practices, we argue for the intervening role of psychological empowerment through which employee perceived HPWS influence proactive behavior. Although the intervening role of psychological empowerment in HPWS-in-role behavior linkage is examined in prior research (e.g., Aryee, Walumbwa, Seidu, & Otaye, 2012;Butts, Vandenberg, DeJoy, Schaffer, & Wilson, 2009;Liao, Toya, Lepak, & Hong, 2009), a more detailed explanation is solicited which explore the reason for HPWS-proactive behavior linkage. We propose that psychological empowerment may explain why employees display proactive behavior in response to HPWS.…”
Section: Psychological Empowerment As a Mediatormentioning
confidence: 99%
“…En definitiva, el estrés de rol afectaría negativamente a los niveles de empowerment psicológico percibidos, y el empowerment psicológico reduciría, a su vez, los niveles de satisfacción en el trabajo. Diversos estudios han analizado el papel mediador del empower ment psicológico entre diversos antecedentes, tales como liderazgo (Zhou et al, 2012), exceso de cualificaciones profesionales (Erdogan & Bauer, 2009), marketing interno (Yao, 2013) o identificación con el trabajo (Butts, Vandenberg, Dejoy, Schaffer & Wilson, 2009), y la satisfacción laboral. Sin embargo, apenas existen investigaciones que analicen especí ficamente las relaciones existentes entre el estrés de rol, el empowerment psicológico y la satisfacción laboral planteada en los modelos de Spreitzer (1995de Spreitzer ( , 1996.…”
Section: Relaciones Entre Estrés De Rol Empowerment Y Satisfacción Lunclassified
“…Huang et al (2006) reported that ±e positive link between participative leadership and organizational commitment was only present for short-tenure employees. Butts et al (2009) found that the participation-organjzatjonal commitment link was strongest for employees who held higher levels ofperceived organizational support.…”
Section: Participation and Organizational Conniitrnentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Cox et al, 2009), degree of confiict with supervisors (Janssen, 2004), organizational tenure, perceived organizational support (Butts et aL, 2009) aud organizationaj culture. For exampie, Smeenk et al (2006) reported that academic employees in two facuities with different cuirnres (hegemonist versus separatist) responded differently to a given set of HR practices, including ±e levei of autonomy.…”
Section: Participation and Organizational Conniitrnentmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation