2009
DOI: 10.1007/s00276-009-0582-z
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Incidence of osseous interclinoid bars in Indian population

Abstract: It was observed that the bony bars between the three clinoid processes can be divided into four types (Types I, II, III, IV). Due to the presence of these bars three types of interclinoid foramina were formed. A total incidence of 22% of various types of interclinoid bars was observed, out of which 12% were Type I, 5.6% Type II, 4% type III and only 0.4% were of type IV variety.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
39
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 23 publications
(39 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
0
39
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For example, matrix Gla protein inhibits calcification in soft tissues while osteopontin slows down the ossification in hard tissues [3]. Archana et al [4] studied 250 adult dried human skulls for the presence of interclinoid bars. They reported a total incidence of 22 % of various types of interclinoid bars.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, matrix Gla protein inhibits calcification in soft tissues while osteopontin slows down the ossification in hard tissues [3]. Archana et al [4] studied 250 adult dried human skulls for the presence of interclinoid bars. They reported a total incidence of 22 % of various types of interclinoid bars.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The following parameters were recorded: 1) Presence/absence of the foramen 2) Complete/incomplete foramen 3) Unilateral/bilateral foramen 4) Dimensions of the foramen (maximum and minimum diameters of the foramen) 5) Dimensions of the ligament (width and thickness of the ligament) 6) Sex of the skull. For the classification of the interclinoid bars, the method proposed by Rani Archana et al [8] and the method proposed by Keyers [9] were used: Rani Archana et al [8] classified interclinoid bars into four types: Type I: -Bridge present between anterior and middle clinoid process (carotico clinoid foramen). Type II: -Bridge between anterior, middle and posterior clinoid process.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In all cases, the anterior, middle, and posterior clinoid processes were examined on both right and left sides to reveal their relationship and the incidence of ossified interclinoid bars. For the classification of the interclinoid bars, the method proposed by Rani Archana et al 10 and the method proposed by Keyers 11 were used. In Type II variety of osseous bridge a fourth subtype of fusion was also observed where a combination of any of the above two subtypes was present between the adjacent clinoid process and this subtype was termed as mixed type 10 .…”
Section: Materials and Methodmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For the classification of the interclinoid bars, the method proposed by Rani Archana et al 10 and the method proposed by Keyers 11 were used. In Type II variety of osseous bridge a fourth subtype of fusion was also observed where a combination of any of the above two subtypes was present between the adjacent clinoid process and this subtype was termed as mixed type 10 . The incidence of caroticoclinoid foramen (include type I & II) and sella turcica bridge (include type II & III) was also studied separately.…”
Section: Materials and Methodmentioning
confidence: 99%