2012
DOI: 10.1097/scs.0b013e31826100ec
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

In Vitro Biomechanical Evaluation of Modified Plating Techniques for Bilateral Sagittal Split Ramus Osteotomy in Mandibular Advancement

Abstract: The aim of this study was to compare the biomechanical properties of modified plate techniques using a newly designed three-dimensional test model after sagittal split ramus osteotomy. Fifteen synthetic polyurethane mandibular replicas were used and divided into 3 groups. Self-tapping 6-mm titanium screws with an outer diameter of 2.0 mm and private designed plates produced by 316-L stainless steel were used in the study. After the osteotomy, the distal part was advanced by 5 mm. The jaw models were placed to … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
19
1
1

Year Published

2015
2015
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(21 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
0
19
1
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The addition of 2 vertical connecting bars at the ends of this Z-shaped design did not result in more stability. 16 In contrast to our study, these studies did not compare this with a fixation method using 3 bicortical screws in an inverted-L pattern, which is considered to be the "gold standard" regarding rigidity in mandibular advancements of up to 10 mm. 4,[15][16][17] Because of this classification, the authors feel that when focusing on stability, a 3 bicortical screws fixation should always be used as a benchmark and control when evaluating new methods of fixation.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 67%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…The addition of 2 vertical connecting bars at the ends of this Z-shaped design did not result in more stability. 16 In contrast to our study, these studies did not compare this with a fixation method using 3 bicortical screws in an inverted-L pattern, which is considered to be the "gold standard" regarding rigidity in mandibular advancements of up to 10 mm. 4,[15][16][17] Because of this classification, the authors feel that when focusing on stability, a 3 bicortical screws fixation should always be used as a benchmark and control when evaluating new methods of fixation.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 67%
“…That is why, similar to our study, other studies have also utilized the in vitro biomechanical method in order to test the mechanical resistance of new osteosynthesis materials. 11,[14][15][16] In this study we simplified the model to an hemimandible and used a cantilevered beam model in mimicking masticatory function. Other biomechanical studies have used whole polyurethane mandibular replicas, in which more complex biomechanical models were used in mimicking masticatory function.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Since it is difficult to obtain this material due to legal and ethical reasons, such in vitro alternative models are controversial, as they cannot exactly reproduce the function of the human bone [ 28 ]. In our study, synthetic jaw models were used because they are easy to obtain, inexpensive, allow for standardization [ 28 , 29 ], and are amenable in evaluating the mechanical characteristics of fixation materials prior to their application in humans [ 27 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%