2022
DOI: 10.31897/pmi.2022.64
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Improving the method for assessment of bending stresses in the wall of an underground pipeline

Abstract: Brief information about modern methods for determining the bending stresses of the extended sections of underground main pipelines without access to the pipeline generatrix is given. The necessity of modernizing methods based on determining the configuration of the pipeline axis from the soil surface with subsequent calculation of bending stresses based on the obtained data is substantiated. A mathematical model that allows to calculate the optimal parameters for surveying the axis of the pipeline from the soi… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Figure 5 shows that, in the modes without additives, the value of A 1 (0) is in the region of 0, and the spread of its values is in the range from −0.5 to 1.5. The above indicates that, in the modes without additives, the value of A 1 (0) is constant for various pumping conditions, and if it differs from the indicated values in the modes with an additive, it is due to the influence of the additive [40][41][42].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Figure 5 shows that, in the modes without additives, the value of A 1 (0) is in the region of 0, and the spread of its values is in the range from −0.5 to 1.5. The above indicates that, in the modes without additives, the value of A 1 (0) is constant for various pumping conditions, and if it differs from the indicated values in the modes with an additive, it is due to the influence of the additive [40][41][42].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The position of an underground pipeline during its operation is currently determined according to the data of in-line inspection [40,41]. The essence of this method is the launch of in-line inspection gauges into the pipeline, which measure the position of the pipeline underground and search for defects.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The above is also confirmed by the presence of a significant amount of hydrogen (up to 0.1 wt. % or 1000 ppm) [11] in metal layers adjacent Energies 2023, 16, 5585 2 of 15 to the outer surface of the destroyed pipe, exceeding the concentration of hydrogen in layers near the inner surface by 2-4 times, which is proved by experiment as per [9]. According to the same authors [9,10], the negative effect of hydrogen dissolved in metal is also the reason for the failure of pipelines carrying sulphur-containing oil products.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 91%
“…Therefore, timely detection of the pipeline section where the pipe wall was hydrogenated is a possible method of failure prevention [13][14][15]. The above conclusion is valid for both compressed hydrogen pipelines, where local hydrogenation of the pipe wall cannot be excluded, e.g., due to plastic deformation caused by soil movement [16] and other bending stresses [17][18][19], and pipelines carrying natural gas and oil products [20][21][22]. At the same time, currently existing methods of detecting increased hydrogen content in metal structures, both by measuring its concentration directly or indirectly-based on the change in mechanical properties of the metal-are destructive, since both use specimens cut from the analysed structure for research.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%