2019
DOI: 10.29333/iji.2019.12444a
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Improving Students’ Scientific Reasoning Skills through the Three Levels of Inquiry

Abstract: This research was aimed at analyzing (1) the effectiveness of the three levels of inquiry (structured, guided and free inquiry) to improve the students' scientific reasoning skills compared to the conventional method; (2) the implementation of the three levels of inquiry. This study can be categorized as quasi-experimental with pre-test posttest non-equivalent control group design. The research sample consisted of 76 students of the Biology Education Study Program in State Islamic University of Sunan Kalijaga,… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
20
0
1

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
3

Relationship

2
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 30 publications
(26 citation statements)
references
References 35 publications
(29 reference statements)
0
20
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The accommodation of cognitive styles in the CSBLS is an effort to facilitate the differences in the way students process information by scaffolding learning so that each student learns in an optimal manner. Previous studies report that the use of scaffolding in the form of three levels of inquiry (structured, guided and free inquiry) can improve competencies such as students' scientific reasoning skills (Yanto, Subali, & Suyanto, 2019), science processing skills (Hardianti & Kuswanto, 2017;Solahuddin & Shadriyah, 2017), cognitive skills, procedural skills, critical thinking, scientific concept understanding and motivation (Artayasa, Susilo, Lestari, & Indriwati, 2018;Zion & Mendelovici, 2012). Malacapay (2019), reported that scaffolding in accordance with students' learning styles could improve their learning outcomes.…”
Section: Ability the Csbls To Facilitate Students' Cognitive Stylesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The accommodation of cognitive styles in the CSBLS is an effort to facilitate the differences in the way students process information by scaffolding learning so that each student learns in an optimal manner. Previous studies report that the use of scaffolding in the form of three levels of inquiry (structured, guided and free inquiry) can improve competencies such as students' scientific reasoning skills (Yanto, Subali, & Suyanto, 2019), science processing skills (Hardianti & Kuswanto, 2017;Solahuddin & Shadriyah, 2017), cognitive skills, procedural skills, critical thinking, scientific concept understanding and motivation (Artayasa, Susilo, Lestari, & Indriwati, 2018;Zion & Mendelovici, 2012). Malacapay (2019), reported that scaffolding in accordance with students' learning styles could improve their learning outcomes.…”
Section: Ability the Csbls To Facilitate Students' Cognitive Stylesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…ICT literacy is a 21st century skill which emphasizes not only on the hardware but also on cognitive skill such as ideas generating and brainstorming, categorizing, conclusion, decision making, and executing the idea to collect the latest information [2]. Meanwhile, problem solving which bases on scientific reasoning ability enables students to answer hypothesis correctly [3]. Therefore, students are acknowledged with 21st century skill and teaching in order to implement social value professionally.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Argumentation skill can be empowered through the provision of problems that are used as triggers in the syntax of problem-based learning (Fang et al, 2019;Pritasari et al, 2015;Tawfik, 2017). The studies includes positive effect of learning model toward scientific reasoning, i.e three level inquiry based learning (Yanto et al, 2019) and 5E learning model (Susilowati & Anam, 2017). Some researchers also reveal the effectiveness of context-based learning (Yu et al, 2015); problem-based learning (Suciati et al, 2020;Syafii & Yasin, 2013); and inquiry learning (Gunawan et al, 2020) toward problem-solving skill.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%