2005
DOI: 10.1016/j.ics.2005.03.155
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Implant design and production—a new approach by selective laser melting

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
27
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
3

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 51 publications
(27 citation statements)
references
References 4 publications
0
27
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In particular, AM has shown the possibility to fabricate patient specific medical devices (e.g. artificial joint replacements) [7][8][9] and parts with optimised topology and lattice structures that could replace heavier counterparts currently used in aircrafts [10][11][12][13].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In particular, AM has shown the possibility to fabricate patient specific medical devices (e.g. artificial joint replacements) [7][8][9] and parts with optimised topology and lattice structures that could replace heavier counterparts currently used in aircrafts [10][11][12][13].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These layer-wise manufacturing methods support a market niche for components with shorter production times and intricate geometry details [1]. Although applications were historically confined to the production of prototypes, modern methods extend to the manufacturing of tooling inserts, biomedical implants, mass-customised consumer products, aerospace components, and artwork [1][2][3][4][5][6][7]. Among the AM methods, selective laser melting (SLM) dominates applications in the industrial and academic sectors [3].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It was, however, clear from this study that the proposed method warranted further exploration and a large amount of further work has been undertaken since this paper. This work included a feasibility study where Wehmöller et al [33] used SLM for direct implant production using 100% stainless steel and titanium, and although the structures were not implanted, the authors concluded that the method was technically feasible. In a similar paper by Das et al [34], the authors produced scaffolds using Nylon 6 via SLS, which is a biocompatible material, but noted problems with biocompatibility from unsintered powders.…”
Section: History 1995-2005mentioning
confidence: 99%