2007
DOI: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2006.06.008
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Impacts of a participatory approach to developing national level sustainable development indicators in Finland

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
36
0
1

Year Published

2007
2007
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 51 publications
(38 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
1
36
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Using foster communities' involvement, Pranger et al [33] developed a framework to guide the evaluation of policy effectiveness in social-ecological systems and to manage the natural environment in sustainable rural development context. According to different authors, community involvement and public participation can be considered as vehicles to achieve sustainable environmental and development policy goals [34][35][36]. Moreover, as regards the UNESCO sites, this strategy can be considered a useful measure for preserving agricultural activity and ensuring sustainability [37].…”
Section: The Best Practices Strategies Actions and Measures Appliedmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Using foster communities' involvement, Pranger et al [33] developed a framework to guide the evaluation of policy effectiveness in social-ecological systems and to manage the natural environment in sustainable rural development context. According to different authors, community involvement and public participation can be considered as vehicles to achieve sustainable environmental and development policy goals [34][35][36]. Moreover, as regards the UNESCO sites, this strategy can be considered a useful measure for preserving agricultural activity and ensuring sustainability [37].…”
Section: The Best Practices Strategies Actions and Measures Appliedmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There are other means of gathering suitable indicators for sustainability assessment, e.g., a participatory approach that involves substantial participation of stakeholders [46], a valid scientific approach [47], integration in the political process [48], and by interviewing experts [49]. As the main purpose in this paper is to test the feasibility of the sustainability assessment framework, the process of selecting indicators is deliberately simplified through literature review for demonstration purposes.…”
Section: Selection Of Indicators: Hpi Kpi and Pmmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Acceptance by the general public is crucial to ensure the legitimacy and sustainability of the adopted policy [134][135][136]. Public participation increases democracy, enhances the competence of the final decision, and adds to the understanding of patterns and perceptions in relation to the studied issue.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The maximum fees originally proposed were USD 600 per car annually, depending on the The widespread use of conventional methods has maintained their dominance in the assessment process of transport-related mitigation measures. However, the implementation of these methods on a stand-alone basis excludes the aspect of the acceptance of the general public, which could jeopardise the success of the assessment, as has been suggested in the literature (e.g., [134][135][136]). Additionally, the different applications of these methods have largely used quantitative data and they have rarely embedded qualitative data in the assessment.…”
Section: Building the Hierarchymentioning
confidence: 99%