2011 IEEE/ACM International Symposium on Nanoscale Architectures 2011
DOI: 10.1109/nanoarch.2011.5941502
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Impact of nanomanufacturing flow on systematic yield losses in nanoscale fabrics

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
3
2
2

Relationship

4
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Unconventional patterning approaches (e.g., nanoimprint lithography (NIL) [18]) can achieve very high density nanowire-arrays, but suffer from extremely poor overlay alignment. Therefore, in our manufacturing pathway, unconventional patterning approaches are used only in the beginning without any alignment or registration offset [5] [13]. All subsequent steps are lithographic and follow lithographic design rules [1].…”
Section: N 3 Asic Fabric Overviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Unconventional patterning approaches (e.g., nanoimprint lithography (NIL) [18]) can achieve very high density nanowire-arrays, but suffer from extremely poor overlay alignment. Therefore, in our manufacturing pathway, unconventional patterning approaches are used only in the beginning without any alignment or registration offset [5] [13]. All subsequent steps are lithographic and follow lithographic design rules [1].…”
Section: N 3 Asic Fabric Overviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To study the impact of mask overlay a methodology was previously developed for a 2D-grid based NASIC fabric [32]. Overlay misalignment between successive masks were modeled as Gaussian random variables and Monte Carlo simulations were carried out in a custom simulator to determine the number of functioning chips.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This sets a dramatic limit on the actual overall features that can be accomplished with reasonably precise alignment and good yield. Furthermore, recent work[Vijayakumar et al 2011] modeling overlay limited yields for NASICs has shown up to 75% yield for 3σ = ±5.7nm (manufacturing solutions known according to ITRS 2009) and 100% yield for 3σ = ±3.3nm (ITRS projection for 16nm CMOS.) 3 A note on Stochastic Interfacing: Stochastic interfacing is not required because NASICs do not assume reconfigurable devices where each device/crossbar needs to be programmed.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%