Extreme Ultraviolet Lithography 2020 2020
DOI: 10.1117/12.2573126
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Image blur investigation using EUV-interference lithography

Abstract: As EUV lithography moves into mass production, photoresist development continues to be one of the most prominent challenges to reach higher resolutions. This work aims to address the resist performance limitations with regards to image blur. Feature quality is a result of the aerial image and the response function of the resist. The contrast of the aerial image is reduced by the exposure tool (optical aberrations and mechanical stability) and the resist (chemical mechanisms and development). Decoupling these t… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

3
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In theory, the interferometric tool provides an ideal sinusoidal aerial image with focus-independent contrast as well as frequency doubling with respect to the diffraction gratings on the mask, with demonstrated 7 nm HP resolution 11 . Admittedly, the ideal contrast of the interference pattern is impacted by several factors, including thermal and mechanical instabilities, leading to image blur σ, which is defined as a single-parameter convolution of resist and tool blur components 12 . Assuming a Gaussian blur model 5 , the aerial image is described as a function of pitch p and blur σ:…”
Section: Exposure Toolmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In theory, the interferometric tool provides an ideal sinusoidal aerial image with focus-independent contrast as well as frequency doubling with respect to the diffraction gratings on the mask, with demonstrated 7 nm HP resolution 11 . Admittedly, the ideal contrast of the interference pattern is impacted by several factors, including thermal and mechanical instabilities, leading to image blur σ, which is defined as a single-parameter convolution of resist and tool blur components 12 . Assuming a Gaussian blur model 5 , the aerial image is described as a function of pitch p and blur σ:…”
Section: Exposure Toolmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The EUV-IL tool represents a powerful alternative to EUV scanners for resist testing 9,[11][12][13][14] . The stripped-down optical setup allows an advantage in cost-effectiveness as well as some flexibility towards testing of materials without potential outgassing and contamination issues .…”
Section: Euv Interference Lithographymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The Z-factor is limited to comparing performances at a given HP. Although this parameter is greatly simplified and does not provide in-depth depiction of performance through pitch, it is useful as a single metric for the first-order judgment of resist potential 8,9 .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In-house targets in dose-to-size (DTS), unbiased-linewidth roughness (LWRunb), and Z-factor = CD 3 •LWR 2 •DTS metrics are used for the quantitative assessment of the material performance. Although the Z-factor is a relatively crude metric 6,7 , it is used sufficiently as a single-parameter metric to evaluate the general performance of materials and allow relative comparison between platforms at a given feature size. Pattern transfer properties are not investigated here, however, platform-specific film thicknesses are considered to ensure further industrial process viability.…”
Section: Asml-psi Resist Screening Programmentioning
confidence: 99%