The Palgrave Handbook of Linguistic (Im)politeness 2017
DOI: 10.1057/978-1-137-37508-7_4
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Ideology and (Im)politeness

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 44 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Among them are the results of research by Culpeper et al (2017), which put the analysis of language impoliteness into three concepts, namely: context, power, and formulation of impoliteness. This research is also relevant to Kienpointner & Stopfner (2017), who concluded that impoliteness is not only related to social relations but is closely related to ideology.…”
Section: Theoretical Basismentioning
confidence: 89%
“…Among them are the results of research by Culpeper et al (2017), which put the analysis of language impoliteness into three concepts, namely: context, power, and formulation of impoliteness. This research is also relevant to Kienpointner & Stopfner (2017), who concluded that impoliteness is not only related to social relations but is closely related to ideology.…”
Section: Theoretical Basismentioning
confidence: 89%
“…Age has thus far been investigated with regard to the cognitive capability of children to formulate requests at a certain age (Carrell, 1981), yet a study on age as a factor determining the choice of one request strategy over another in different varieties of English is still pending. Nevertheless, various studies on politeness in general have shown that ‘[g]eneration‐specific views of (im)politeness hold that different generations talk and behave differently […]’ (Kienpointner & Stopfner, 2017, p. 73). Therefore, the present paper includes speaker age as a factor possibly relevant for the choice of request strategy in two South Asian English varieties, namely IndE and SLE.…”
Section: Theoretical Background On Requestsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Such context-specific situations are also affected by "the view of members of particular communities of practice and/or speech communities" (Kienpointner and Stopfner, 2017, p.69). Kienpointner and Stopfner (2017) add that impoliteness is construed by understanding the nature of subgroups and their context of culture. They analyzed ideological aspects of impoliteness in their case study about a TV debate before the election of the Austrian Parliament in 2006.…”
Section: Impoliteness In Mediated Discoursementioning
confidence: 99%
“…They analyzed ideological aspects of impoliteness in their case study about a TV debate before the election of the Austrian Parliament in 2006. Kienpointner and Stopfner (2017) pinpoint attacks and counter-attacks cause "face-damage" to the political participants before the elections.…”
Section: Impoliteness In Mediated Discoursementioning
confidence: 99%