Ideologia e populismo Adhemar de Barros Miguel Arraes Carlos Lacerda Leonel Brizola

Debert, Guita Grin

doi:10.7476/9788599662724

Cited by 13 publications

(19 citation statements)

References 3 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…The degree of attention and the content covers changes from a candidate’s proposal to an elected government project. For this reason, according to Guita Debert (2008, p. 50), the inaugural speech “is the moment of rectification of the legitimacy of a power conquered through a project of transformative action endorsed by the social whole.”…”

Section: Mapping Executive Attention In Brazilmentioning

confidence: 99%

Policy Change in Brazil: New Challenges for Policy Analysis in Latin America

Brasil¹,

Capella²,

Fagan³

2020

Latin American Policy

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

From the emergence of punctuated equilibrium theory in the United States in the mid‐1990s to the creation of the Comparative Agendas Project, scholars have predicted that punctuated equilibrium theory and related agenda‐setting theories can be applied across all systems. Yet most of the literature to date has focused on Western countries. The Brazilian Agendas Project has now made data available on a wide range of policy inputs and outputs, the first such data available in Latin America. The objective of this article is introduce the data from the Brazilian project, justify the choices made in collecting and coding it, and present descriptive analyses on the dynamics of governmental attention toward different policy issues over time.

show abstract

Section: Mapping Executive Attention In Brazilmentioning

confidence: 99%

Policy Change in Brazil: New Challenges for Policy Analysis in Latin America

Brasil¹,

Capella²,

Fagan³

2020

Latin American Policy

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…Stalwarts Jaguaribe (1974), Ianni (1975), and Weffort (1978, 1966) published compilations of their earlier works, with enhancements. They were joined by new voices like Brito (1978), Andrade (1979), Debert (1979), and Camargo (1979). These writers decried the populist episode (sometimes called a republic) as a betrayal of the working class.…”

Section: Smentioning

confidence: 99%

A historiography of populism and neopopulism in Latin America

Conniff

2020

History Compass

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

For over a half-century, Latin American and other scholars have written reams and held innumerable conferences about the populist style of politics in the region. Historians quickly joined in with their theories, methods, and perspectives. Most literature focused on the classic period from the 1930s to 1970s, when populism dominated many nations' governments. In the 1980s and 1990s, as the region rebounded from military dictatorship, new leaders using populist methods won office and instituted economic policies in line with neoliberalism. This reappearance, called neopopulism, sparked new interest in the subject. Finally, after 2000, numerous left-leaning politicians gave rise to a radical phase of neopopulism that lasted over a decade. This essay follows historians' and social scientists' work documenting and analyzing these phenomena. 1 | INTRODUCTION The term populism first arose with reference to Latin America in the 1940s and soon became broadly applied to many leaders, parties, movements, policies, and episodes, before and after. The phenomenon seemed to disappear during the military regimes of the 1960s, 1970s, and 1980s, only to reappear in the 1990s in the guise of neopopulism. Over the decades the concept found frequent usage in Brazil,

show abstract

“…30 Especificamente quanto à noção de manipulação, Ideologia e populismo, de G. Debert (2008Debert ( [1979), não por acaso inspirado pelos insights da antropologia e da virada linguística, nuançou o chamado discurso populista ao mostrar que a diferentes noções de povo correspondem diversos políticos populistas. Embora não trate de movimentos sociais, essa obra é também exemplo da reviravolta conceitual que atravessava nossas ciências sociais e da posição então destacada da produção weffortiana nelas.…”

Section: Duas Conclusõesunclassified

Quando Novos Conceitos Entraram Em Cena: História Intelectual Do “Populismo” E Sua Influência Na Gênese Do Debate Brasileiro Sobre Movimentos Sociais

Szwako

Araujo

2019

Estud. hist. (Rio J.)

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

RESUMO O texto segue a trajetória da produção de F. Weffort sobre o chamado “populismo” e mostra seus efeitos no debate dos “movimentos sociais urbanos” e também dos “novos personagens em cena” , defendendo uma história intelectual centrada em ideias e nas tensões entre intelectualidade e expectativas políticas. A observação de inflexões e continuidades na tese populista permite chegar a dois resultados. A miríade de conceitos que marcou, em parte, a gênese da discussão brasileira sobre movimentos sociais nasce como crítica e adesão à herança weffortiana. Além disso, o artigo mostra que os novos conceitos não se gestam em algo como um “campo acadêmico”, e sim nascem de inspirações e influências daquele conjunto de intelectuais e das apostas por eles forjadas em seus núcleos na sociedade civil (o Cedec, no caso) ou nas relações com outros atores civis e partidários.

show abstract

Ideologia e populismo Adhemar de Barros Miguel Arraes Carlos Lacerda Leonel Brizola

Cited by 13 publications

References 3 publications

Policy Change in Brazil: New Challenges for Policy Analysis in Latin America

Policy Change in Brazil: New Challenges for Policy Analysis in Latin America

A historiography of populism and neopopulism in Latin America

Quando Novos Conceitos Entraram Em Cena: História Intelectual Do “Populismo” E Sua Influência Na Gênese Do Debate Brasileiro Sobre Movimentos Sociais

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About