Identification of misconceptions on heat and temperature among physics education students using four-tier diagnostic test

Abstract

This study aims to identify misconception among physics education students in Yogyakarta on heat and temperature topic of physics education. This study uses descriptive study in terms of scanning model. The sample consist of 39 students majoring physics education in Yogyakarta. Data collection uses four tier diagnostic test. This study not only intends to diagnose students’ misconceptions in depth analyis in five categories, but also diagnoses students’ conceptual understanding from each subaspect. The descriptive analysis findings of this study state that the four tier diagnostic test instrument classifies students in five categories as the data analysis outcome about heat and temperature. They are scientific conceptual, lack of knowledge, misconception, false positive and false negative. The conceptual understanding of physics education students in Yogyakarta on heat and temperature topic varies greatly. Based on the results, the percentage of physics education students’ misconceptions in Yogyakarta varies on each subtopic misconception. The biggest misconception occurs in subtopic “thermal equilibrium only occurs if both systems contact directly” reached 61.5%. This shows that the student’s misconception is in high category and need special attention for educators to carry remediation out. Moreover, biggest misconception subtopic is needed more detailed explanations. In addition, this finding is expected to used as one of lecturers’ or teachers’ references to take consideration on the subtopic of heat and temperature which have many potential for misconception. Therefore, the teachers are able to implement the effective teaching strategy to overcome their students’ misconceptions on heat and temperature.

Relationship of Science Process Skills on Critical Thinking Ability Review By Gender In Madrasah Aliyah

“…The purpose of learning physics is to get a direct understanding of various facts, solve problems on an object and have a scientific attitude that is shown in everyday life (Kahar, 2018;Sharfina et al, 2017;Dewi & Afrizon, 2020;Susanti et al, 2020). The low value of students in learning physics is because most students only memorize theories, laws of physics and do not understand the concepts that have been conveyed by the teacher (Anwar et al, 2017;Affandy et al, 2019;Fenditasari et al, 2020).…”

Identifikasi miskonsepsi siswa menggunakan tes diagnostik 4 tahap pada materi gerak

“…Misalnya: two-tier (Fratiwi et al, 2017;C.-Y. Lin & Wang, 2017), three-tier (Anggraeni & Suliyanah, 2017;Sukarelawan et al, 2019), dan four-tier (Fenditasari et al, 2020;Janah et al, 2021). Tes diagnostik empat tahap dikembangkan untuk kebutuhan prosedur pembelajaran dan juga menyempurnakan tes diagnostik yang lebih dahulu dikembangkan.…”

Five-Tier Multiple-Choice Diagnostic Test Development: Empirical Evidences to Improve Students’ Science Literacy

“…Confidence Rating was added to the three-tier test and evolved into a four-tier test that increases the confidence level of an answer and the explanation for the answer will be more accurate. The four-tier test consists of four-level: multiple-choice questions to test knowledge, answer confidence level at the first level, answer rationale at the first level, and level of confidence (sure or unsure) of the answer's rationale at the third level [2], [9], [12][13][14][15][16].…”