2003
DOI: 10.1016/s0165-5876(02)00285-9
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Identification of hearing loss in newborns by transient otoacoustic emissions

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4

Citation Types

0
15
0
4

Year Published

2004
2004
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 22 publications
(19 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
0
15
0
4
Order By: Relevance
“…The failed test in level I screening was as high as 10% in our study. This was much higher than 4.5% reported in Slovakia [31]. Higher prevalence rates of hearing loss could be one of the factors responsible for more failed tests in Oman.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 55%
“…The failed test in level I screening was as high as 10% in our study. This was much higher than 4.5% reported in Slovakia [31]. Higher prevalence rates of hearing loss could be one of the factors responsible for more failed tests in Oman.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 55%
“…Hearing loss is classified as mild (26-40 dB), moderate (41-55 dB), moderate to severe (56-70 dB), severe (71-90 dB), and very severe (above 91 dB). A congenital hearing loss in a range of approximately 500-4000 Hz and are over 30 dB would affect normal speech and language development of the baby (29).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[17] There are different protocols for newborn hearing screening in the literature. The most common program used for newborn hearing screening is triple screening program [18,19] which means application of 2 times TEOAE and 1 time screening ABR. In the present study, triple screening program was also used and bilateral hearing was considered as passed.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the present study, triple screening program was also used and bilateral hearing was considered as passed. There are some studies which considered unilateral hearing as passed [12,19] but we thought that if we consider unilateral hearing as passed, we may ignore the hearing disorders of the contralateral ear.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%