2006
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijporl.2005.08.020
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Neonatal screening for hearing impairment—The Oman experience

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

1
18
1
2

Year Published

2007
2007
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 32 publications
(22 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
1
18
1
2
Order By: Relevance
“…The rate of sensorineural hearing loss among well infants at our hospital (0.18%) was very similar to reported incidences from Saudi Arabia (0.18%) [13] and Oman (0.12%) [14] but was considerably lower than in Kuwait (2.0%) and Jordan (1.37%) [7]. The international figures for hearing deficit among well babies has been reported to range between 0.1% and 0.2% [1][2][3].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 88%
“…The rate of sensorineural hearing loss among well infants at our hospital (0.18%) was very similar to reported incidences from Saudi Arabia (0.18%) [13] and Oman (0.12%) [14] but was considerably lower than in Kuwait (2.0%) and Jordan (1.37%) [7]. The international figures for hearing deficit among well babies has been reported to range between 0.1% and 0.2% [1][2][3].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 88%
“…It was also comparable to the coverage of 99.9% in Mexico [24] or 98.9% in Hong Kong [25] and exceeded the coverage of 91% in Brazil [26], 85% in Malaysia [27], 67% in Oman [28] or 45% in South Africa [29]. This high screening coverage reflected significant maternal willingness to participate in the new voluntary infant hearing screening programme in this location as no mother withheld consent.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 58%
“…After the first stage screening in fact, our overall referral rate was 3.64% with a percentage value of false positives of only 3.34%; therefore we obtained, just with the first step, lower value than the most TEOAE based screening programmes from other countries such as Malaysia (12%), South Africa (11.1%), Oman (11%), Pakistan (10.2%) and Polonia (4.4%) maintaining a good coverage percentage [7,14,25,26,29]. The specificity value after first step screening was 96.7 AE 1.6% and, this percentage increased to 98.78 AE 0.3% after the second stage screening with a total number of 51 referred, 41 of which false positives (1.21%) ( Table 2).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 64%
“…In our pilot study, even if babies underwent screening in the third week of life, after discharge with a consequent higher risk of loss from the screen with respect to those screened before discharge, the coverage rate ranged from 90% to 92.71% with a mean value of 91% in line with JCHI, comparable to the coverage of Mexico, Hong Kong, Brazil and higher than those of 85% in Malaysia, 67% in Oman and 45% in South Africa [14,16,[23][24][25][26].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%