Newborn hearing screening results in an inner part of Aegean region

Özbay, İsa

doi:10.2399/jmu.2014003009

Cited by 4 publications

(3 citation statements)

References 21 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…The rate was 1.7% in our study, the rates of unilateral and bilateral hearing loss were 0.3% and 1.4%, respectively. In another study conducted in our country, the rates of unilateral and bilateral hearing loss were 0.17% and 0.3%, respectively 14 .…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 79%

Neonatal hearing test results in the Çukurova region

Erkan¹,

Tuhanioğlu²

2019

Dicle Tıp Dergisi

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Objective: In this article, we aimed to present the neonatal hearing screening protocol and test results in healthy neonates in Adana City Training and Research Hospital, Adana. Method: A total of 2022 healthy newborns were scanned between November 2018 and February 2019 in our hospital with a three-stage screening protocol. Initial transient evoked otoacoustic emissions (TEOAE), followed by a second stage transient evoked otoacoustic emission and third stage automated auditory brainstem response (A-ABR) were used. If there was a referral with these two methods, clinical BERA was used. High risk newborns were defined. Results: In total, of the 2022 infants included in the study, hearing loss was detected in 34 newborns and the frequency of congenital hearing loss was 1.7%. According to our results, hyperbilirubinemia was more common in infants with hearing loss. Conclusion: Performing hearing screening tests in all newborns, raising public awareness on this issue, and legal follow-up are very important.

show abstract

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 79%

Neonatal hearing test results in the Çukurova region

Erkan¹,

Tuhanioğlu²

2019

Dicle Tıp Dergisi

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…In the literature, triple screening NHS (application of 2 times Transient otoacoustic emissions (TEOAE) and once screening ABR) was most commonly seen. (17,18). 2 stages of NHS with ABR was seen in studies by Rouev and Gaborjan (19).…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 92%

“…In addition, many problems or disadvantages still exist with some protocols, such as high referral rates, great numbers of false positives, or increased rates of lost-to-followup of infants in the latter tests (16). Moreover, different NHS programs have been used in different countries (17). Otoacoustic emissions (OAE), ABR or combined protocols were used intensively in our country and in the world.…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Neonatal Hearing Screening Results with Screening ABR Protocol

Sarı

BÜLBÜL²,

ERSÜ

2022

Pediatric Practice and Research

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Aim:The study aimed to present the results of our universal newborn hearing screening results at a secondary care hospital in Mardin by ABR and review with the literature. Materials and method: A total of 7134 newborns were screened between January 2021 and December 2021using ABR as first, second, third steps. Newborns who failed and at risk are referred to reference hospital and the results were obtained from the records. Result:Of the 7134 newborns,6179 are first test, 955 were retested. Failure in first test was 13.3%. 235(3.2%) of patients were referred to reference center. 0.5% were referred due to test failure, 2.7% were referred due to risk. 27 patients(3.7%) were obtained from records of reference center as abnormal results in clinical Automated Brain stem Response(ABR).16 of them (0.5%) were congenital hearing loss(CHL) who need rehabilitation. Conclusion: Incidence of hearing loss and the rate of failure in first and second test were consistent with the literature. However, reference rate increased due to reference caused by risk factors.

show abstract