2011
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijheatmasstransfer.2011.07.040
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Hydraulic and thermal characteristics of a vapor venting two-phase microchannel heat exchanger

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
19
1

Year Published

2015
2015
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 92 publications
(20 citation statements)
references
References 36 publications
0
19
1
Order By: Relevance
“…7b) show that the performance of the new device is achieved at 1e2 orders of magnitude lower mass flux as compared to that of prior studies. In particular, an order of magnitude difference between the results of this study and those of David et al [34] (large highlighted red stars) that implemented a vapor venting membrane is noteworthy. The arrangement utilized by David et al [34] (cf.…”
Section: Resultscontrasting
confidence: 84%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…7b) show that the performance of the new device is achieved at 1e2 orders of magnitude lower mass flux as compared to that of prior studies. In particular, an order of magnitude difference between the results of this study and those of David et al [34] (large highlighted red stars) that implemented a vapor venting membrane is noteworthy. The arrangement utilized by David et al [34] (cf.…”
Section: Resultscontrasting
confidence: 84%
“…This requires, unlike any other two-phase heat sink discussed in literature, the heat sink to have no liquid exit. A prior effort on utilizing venting membranes in two-phase heat sinks by David et al [34] could not improve the CHF because no mechanism was implemented to constrain the bubbles and their coverage of the heat transfer surface. In essence, bubbles could freely expand and cover the heat transfer surface (cf.…”
Section: Fundamentals Of the New Conceptmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Several geometric enhancements have been proposed to suppress instabilities, such as inlet restrictions [101], channel tapering [102] and the use of surface roughness [103]. Recent work at Stanford has focused on vapor/liquid phase separation, i.e., vapor extraction from a microchannel flow using permeable membrane surfaces [104] or heat pipeinspired separation using phase-separator coatings on a porous medium which keeps liquid contained within structure by surface forces, yet allows evaporation at the boundaries. One remaining challenge with membrane vapor separation is membrane clogging.…”
Section: Two-phase Liquid Coolingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Especially for such applications, flow boiling in micro-channels has been identified to be very promising as the phase change process facilitates smaller thermal resistances [2] and the pumping power requirement too is quite small [3].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%