2018
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-319-91476-3_42
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

How to Match Jobs and Candidates - A Recruitment Support System Based on Feature Engineering and Advanced Analytics

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In recent years, several preliminary studies have focused on predicting recruiters' decisions [5,6,[13][14][15]. However, imitating the recruiter's decision may not necessarily be the best approach, since they are often affected by highly subjective and potentially inaccurate judgments that preserve, rather than improve, hiring biases.…”
Section: Functional Dimensionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In recent years, several preliminary studies have focused on predicting recruiters' decisions [5,6,[13][14][15]. However, imitating the recruiter's decision may not necessarily be the best approach, since they are often affected by highly subjective and potentially inaccurate judgments that preserve, rather than improve, hiring biases.…”
Section: Functional Dimensionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Previous efforts have been invested in trying to predict recruiters' decisions (e.g., [5,6]). Such prediction models, if accurate enough, may eventually replace the human recruiter and save a considerable amount of resources.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…During such expert validation, the quality of recommendations is inquired by a group of 'experts', which may be the researchers themselves, HR/recruitment experts, or sometimes students (e.g., [85]). Although the choice for expert validation is rarely discussed, we do find that for CBR and KB job recommender systems, approximately half of the contributions use expert validation [63,64,27,65,9,127,128,57,115,88,109,45].…”
Section: Validationmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…In CBRs, one creates vector representations of the vacancy and user profile in an unsupervised way, i.e., the dimensions of these representations may not have an intuitive interpretation. Many authors use Bag of Words (BoW) with TF-IDF weighting [90,63,28,37,27], though also Latent Dirichlet Allocation is used [9], and the more recent word2vec [45,115,57]. Interestingly, CBR contributions have been relatively stable in the past 10 years, but also, they were not part of the top contributions during the 2016 and 2017 RecSys competitions (see Table 1).…”
Section: Content-based Jrsmentioning
confidence: 99%