How to compare regional powers: analytical concepts and research topics

Abstract

Although the concept of regional power is frequently used in International Relations (IR) literature, there is no consensus regarding the defining characteristics of a regional power. The article discusses different theoretical approaches that address the topic of power hierarchies in international politics and make reference to the concept of regional power. Marking differences as well as common ground with the more traditional concept of ‘middle powers’, the article outlines an analytical concept of regional powers adequate for contemporary IR research. The analytical dimensions of the framework may be employed to differentiate regional powers from other states and to compare regional powers with regard to their power status or relative power. Furthermore, the article investigates the possible repercussions of the rise of regional powers for international politics and discusses the probable importance and functions of regional governance structures for regional powers

Classifying Middle Powers based on their Regional and Multilateral Roles: Differentiating Middle Power Enforcers, Assemblers and Advocators

“…Therefore, middle powers could conduct their role in regional or international institutions effectively when there is a set of norms accepted by its member states [6]. By having international credibility, the middle power will also take actions on behalf of its regional interests in global forums [22].…”

Narratives of Change and Theorisations on Continuity: the Duality of the Concept of Emerging Power in International Relations

“…Within this context, the debate on conceptual alternatives for the denotation of these new actors arises (Hurrell et al 2000;Jordaan 2003;Cooper, Antikiewicz and Shaw 2007;Schwengel 2008;Nolte 2010;Schenoni 2012;Hurrell 2013;Cooper and Flemes 2013;Brüt-sch and Papa 2013). Underlying the dispute among established categories of international relations theory -i.e.…”

“…Buzan and Waever (2003) conceive regional polarisation, its patterns of amity and enmity, as a complex societal phenomenon. Leadership and authority are perceived as central components in this sense (Flemes 2007;Nolte 2010;Destradi 2010;Frazier and Stewart-Ingersoll 2013). Hence, a diplomatic claim for regional leadership must be grounded in the possession of will and resources to provide public goods and act as the stabiliser of the subsystem, but also in being recognised for this role (Mattli 1999;Flemes 2007;Schirm 2010;Wehner 2014).…”

Latin America's New Regional Architecture: A Cooperative or Segmented Regional Governance Complex?

“…This article shares the view that one should take seriously the statements, declarations and proposals of actors involved in regional projects. Regional powers (see Nolte 2010; and their regional projects are important drivers behind the creation of new regional (intergovernmental) organizations, which can compete for members and mandates (with regard to UNASUR and the Organization of American States (OAS) see Nolte/Wehner 2013a).…”