2019
DOI: 10.1088/1742-6596/1188/1/012080
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

How teacher professionalism influences student behaviour in mathematical problem-solving process

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
13
0
6

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 23 publications
(19 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
0
13
0
6
Order By: Relevance
“…Harisman et al (2018) has also categorized teacher's attitude towards mathematical problem solving and the learning process on mathematical problem solving that can be seen in Table 3. Research Harisman et al (2019b) has also categorized the extension of teacher's didactic and pedagogic in the learning process of problem solving, categorized in good, very good, and excellent which can be seen in Table 4. One-way interaction from teachers to students in mathematical problem-solving process Two-way interaction but not involving other students in mathematical problem-solving process Two-way interaction by involving other students collaboratively in the process of solving mathematical problems These teacher categories influence how students behave in problem solving.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Harisman et al (2018) has also categorized teacher's attitude towards mathematical problem solving and the learning process on mathematical problem solving that can be seen in Table 3. Research Harisman et al (2019b) has also categorized the extension of teacher's didactic and pedagogic in the learning process of problem solving, categorized in good, very good, and excellent which can be seen in Table 4. One-way interaction from teachers to students in mathematical problem-solving process Two-way interaction but not involving other students in mathematical problem-solving process Two-way interaction by involving other students collaboratively in the process of solving mathematical problems These teacher categories influence how students behave in problem solving.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…One-way interaction from teachers to students in mathematical problem-solving process Two-way interaction but not involving other students in mathematical problem-solving process Two-way interaction by involving other students collaboratively in the process of solving mathematical problems These teacher categories influence how students behave in problem solving. Research Harisman et al (2019b) examines the influence of teacher professionalism in the learning process on students' problem solving behaviour. The results of this study conclude that teacher professionalism is one of the external factors that influence student behaviour in solving problems.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This paper was trying to answer that question. This series of investigations extends earlier work to include the examination of how distance of student home from school, family background of student, Contests -contests like math Olympiads that had been followed might influence problem solving behavior of student (Harisman et al, 2018;Harisman, Kusumah, & Kusnandi, 2019a;2019b;Harisman, Kusumah, Kusnandi, & Noto, 2019;Kariman, Harisman, Sovia, & Prahmana, 2019).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 67%
“…Selanjutnya bahan ajar yang tepat juga dapat meningkatkan HOTS siswa (Harisman, 2014;Kariman, Harisman, Sovia, & Prahmana, 2019) Beberapa penelitian sudah mengkaji bagaimana profesionalisme guru dalam pembelajaran. Harisman, Kusumah, & Kusnandi (2019b) telah melihat bagaimana guru meyakini pembelajaran dan siswanya. Guru yang meyakini pembelajaran yang dilakukan adalah proses konstruksi oleh siswa, akan mengajar dengan proses constructivism, sedangkan guru yang meyakini pembelajaran adalah proses transfer ilmu, maka guru akan mengajar dengan cara ceramah.…”
Section: Pendahuluanunclassified