Proceedings. 2003 International Symposium on System-on-Chip (IEEE Cat. No.03EX748)
DOI: 10.1109/issoc.2003.1267722
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Highly scalable network on chip for reconfigurable systems

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
23
0

Publication Types

Select...
3
2
2

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 47 publications
(23 citation statements)
references
References 3 publications
0
23
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, both area and frequency vary a lot: from 3 kilogates to 480 kilogates and from 1 MHz to 500 MHz. Router [26] supports variable number of ports and results are given for router with 5 input and 5 output ports. Note also, that those results are for Xilinx Virtex FPGA (embedded buffer memories are included in gate count) whereas all other results are for ASIC technologies.…”
Section: Synthesis Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…However, both area and frequency vary a lot: from 3 kilogates to 480 kilogates and from 1 MHz to 500 MHz. Router [26] supports variable number of ports and results are given for router with 5 input and 5 output ports. Note also, that those results are for Xilinx Virtex FPGA (embedded buffer memories are included in gate count) whereas all other results are for ASIC technologies.…”
Section: Synthesis Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore, the latency is not affected notably. However, for the configurations resulting in higher latencies (configurations [12][13][14][15][16][17][18][19][20][21][22][23][24][25][26][27], the high priority offers great benefit. Regarding all configurations, high relative priority obtains 31% lower average latency and 41% lower maximum latency than the low priority.…”
Section: The Effect Of Network Parametersmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Peak(1) in Figure 5 has been obtained by applying a window spreading technique ( Figure 3(b,c)) whereas the second peak was obtained by allocating continuous blocks of bandwidth (Figure 3a). In both cases the window size gradually decreases from 100% (98.85 MB/s when clocked at 50 MHz [4]) down to 0.0244% (approximately 25 KB/s). The window spreading technique clearly performs better: the throughput of the video decoder application only starts to decrease when the OS diminishes its effective window to less than 2% of the total bandwidth and reaches half of the throughput for a total allocated window of less than 1.5% (about 1.5 MB/s).…”
Section: Application Descriptionmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…Consequently, this message is sent to the slave node (2) . Once the message is received on the slave node (3) , its function number and parameters are unwrapped and the respective local OS function executes at the slave node (4) . The return value (5) is packed into a message (6) , sent over the control network to the cNIC stub, where it is unpacked (7) .…”
Section: Operating Systemmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The work by Bartic et al [2] proposes a parameterized router with varying numbers of input and output ports. Although it is similar to our configurable router, their solution left the network configuration and routing algorithm for the user to program, providing versatility at the expense of increased development time.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%