High Ultraviolet A Protection Affords Greater Immune Protection Confirming that Ultraviolet A Contributes to Photoimmunosuppression in Humans

Abstract

Solar radiation causes immunosuppression that contributes to skin cancer growth. Photoprotective strategies initially focused on the more erythemogenic ultraviolet B. More recently, the relationship of ultraviolet A and skin cancer has received increased attention. We hypothesized that if ultraviolet A contributes significantly to human ultraviolet-induced immune suppression, then increased ultraviolet A filtration by a sunscreen would better protect the immune system during ultraviolet exposure. Two hundred and eleven volunteers were randomized into study groups and received solar-simulated radiation, ranging from 0 to 2 minimum erythema dose, on gluteal skin, with or without sunscreen, 48 h prior to sensitization with dinitrochlorobenzene. Contact hypersensitivity response was evaluated by measuring the increase in skin fold thickness of five graded dinitrochlorobenzene challenge sites on the arm, 2 wk after sensitization. Clinical scoring using the North American Contact Dermatitis Group method was also performed. Solar-simulated radiation dose-response curves were generated and immune protection factor was calculated using a nonlinear regression model. Significance of immune protection between study groups was determined with the Mann-Whitney-Wilcoxon exact test. The sunscreen with high ultraviolet A absorption (ultraviolet A protection factor of 10, based on the in vivo persistent pigment darkening method) and a labeled sun protection factor of 15 demonstrated better immune protection than the product that had a low ultraviolet A absorption (ultraviolet A protection factor of 2) and a labeled sun protection factor of 15. Nonlinear regression analysis based on skin fold thickness increase revealed that the high ultraviolet A protection factor sunscreen had an immune protection factor of 50, more than three times its sun protection factor, whereas the low ultraviolet A protection factor sunscreen had an immune protection factor of 15, which was equal to its labeled sun protection factor. This study demonstrates that ultraviolet A contributes greatly to human immune suppression and that a broad-spectrum sunscreen with high ultraviolet A filtering capacity results in immune protection that exceeds erythema protection. These results show that high ultraviolet A protection is required to protect against ultraviolet-induced damage to cutaneous immunity.

The role of antioxidants in photoprotection: A critical review

“…The degree of protection is directly related to the level of UVA protection. [38][39][40][41] In mice studies, Halliday et al 42 used AOxs to evaluate UVA-induced immunosuppression. In the presence of topical L-NMMA (nitric oxide inhibitor), iron chelator 2,2'-dipyridl, and the SOD-mimicking agent 4-hydroxytempol, antigen induction on irradiated skin was reduced to undetectable levels.…”

Protective Effect of (-)-Epigallocatechin Gallate against Photo-Damage Induced by Ultraviolet A in Human Skin Fibroblasts

“…UV A plays a significant role in producing genotoxic bipyrimidine photo-products [6]. In vivo human studies show that UV A irradiation also has immunosuppressive effects [7]. Chronic and excessive UV exposure depletes human cutaneous defense mechanisms [8].…”

Sunlight, tanning booths, and vitamin D

“…26,27 The IPF is therefore useful in detecting not only UVB injury but also injury responses that may be poorly detected by SPF, such as those induced by UVA and the propensity of UVA to generate reactive oxygen species. 28 Antioxidants appear to play a role in downregulating the photocarcinogenic effect of UV.…”