2011
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-642-24154-3_26
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

High-Speed and Low-Power PID Structures for Embedded Applications

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
1

Year Published

2012
2012
2014
2014

Publication Types

Select...
3
2

Relationship

2
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
(14 reference statements)
0
5
1
Order By: Relevance
“…For r ranging from 8 to 64, ß''2 8 is the fastest algorithm, but it is outperformed by ß2 32 for r values greater than 64. ß2 2 algorithm served to design a 16-bit set-point PID. The implementation results outperformed the published ones at all levels [7]. …”
Section: Multiplication Algorithmcontrasting
confidence: 54%
“…For r ranging from 8 to 64, ß''2 8 is the fastest algorithm, but it is outperformed by ß2 32 for r values greater than 64. ß2 2 algorithm served to design a 16-bit set-point PID. The implementation results outperformed the published ones at all levels [7]. …”
Section: Multiplication Algorithmcontrasting
confidence: 54%
“…ß2 2 algorithm served to design a scalable 16-bit setpoint PID controller employing five multiplication cores. The implementation results outperformed the published ones at all levels [14].…”
Section: Based On Theory and Implementation Results It Is Set Clear mentioning
confidence: 79%
“…3), targeting applications where the serialization of multiplication is mandatory. This is the case for instance in embedded digital PID (Peripheral Integral Derivative) controller where five multiplication cores are required [14], or for high-precision or very large operand size applications (cryptography) where a fully-parallel n×n bit implementation is excluded.…”
Section: B Radix 2 4 Recodingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A double-recursive (s=2) version of equation (15) served to design a scalable 16-bit setpoint Finite-Word-Length PID controller, employing five multiplication cores. The implementation results outperformed the published ones at all levels [23].…”
Section: B Delaymentioning
confidence: 79%