2020
DOI: 10.1021/acsami.0c17751
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

High-Responsivity Photodetector Based on a Suspended Monolayer Graphene/RbAg4I5 Composite Nanostructure

Abstract: Graphene has excellent electrical, optical, thermal, and mechanical properties that make it an ideal optoelectronic material. However, it still has some problems, such as a very low light absorption rate, which means it cannot meet the application requirements of high-performance optoelectronic devices. Here, we produce a high-responsivity photodetector based on a monolayer graphene/RbAg4I5 composite nanostructure. With the aid of poly­(methyl methacrylate), we suspend the monolayer graphene on a hollow carvin… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 47 publications
(68 reference statements)
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The solar-blind SBD exhibited a high rectifying characteristic after illumination at 255 nm in forward voltage under 0 V. The responsivity reached 0.64 (mA/W). The responsivity was estimated as follows [ 37 ]: where , , and are the photocurrent at a given voltage, the dark current, and the power density, respectively. With zero bias voltage, the photodetector had good responsivity under 255 nm light illumination with intensity of 1 (mW/cm 2 ).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The solar-blind SBD exhibited a high rectifying characteristic after illumination at 255 nm in forward voltage under 0 V. The responsivity reached 0.64 (mA/W). The responsivity was estimated as follows [ 37 ]: where , , and are the photocurrent at a given voltage, the dark current, and the power density, respectively. With zero bias voltage, the photodetector had good responsivity under 255 nm light illumination with intensity of 1 (mW/cm 2 ).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%