Proceedings. 2005 IEEE International Conference on Field-Programmable Technology, 2005.
DOI: 10.1109/fpt.2005.1568518
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

High-radix systolic modular multiplication on reconfigurable hardware

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
24
0

Publication Types

Select...
3
2
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 20 publications
(24 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
0
24
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In fact, this is a common barrier in the high-radix Montgomery algorithm implementations: the quotient is hard to generate in a single clock cycle. This barrier also exists in other systolic high-radix designs [9,22].…”
Section: High-radix Montgomery Multiplicationmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In fact, this is a common barrier in the high-radix Montgomery algorithm implementations: the quotient is hard to generate in a single clock cycle. This barrier also exists in other systolic high-radix designs [9,22].…”
Section: High-radix Montgomery Multiplicationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…From the perspective of the radix, the Montgomery multiplication implementations can be divided into two categories: radix-2 based [7,21] and high-radix based [1,2,9,11,17,19,20,22,23]. Compared with the former one, the latter, which can significantly reduce the required clock cycles, are preferred for high-speed applications.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This feature makes the implementation expensive. The systolic high-radix design by McIvor et al described in [13] is also capable of very high speed operation, but suffers from the same disadvantage of large area requirements for fast multiplier units. A different approach based on processing multi-precision operands in carry-save form has been presented in [14].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…MWRkMM algorithm requires the built-in multipliers to speed up the computation and this feature makes the implementation expensive. The systolic high-radix design by McIvor et al described in [10] is also capable of very high speed operation, but suffers from the same disadvantage of large requirements for fast multiplier units. A different approach based on processing multi-precision operands in carry-save form has been presented in [11].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%