Proceedings IEEE International Conference on Application-Specific Systems, Architectures, and Processors
DOI: 10.1109/asap.2000.862383
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

High-level synthesis of nonprogrammable hardware accelerators

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
104
0
1

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 112 publications
(106 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
0
104
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Consequently, the derivation of memory interfaces between processor arrays and external memory devices is gaining attention from the research community. First attempts for solving the data I/O were based on ad-hoc arbitrator mechanisms implemented in hardware and controlled by a host [9].…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Consequently, the derivation of memory interfaces between processor arrays and external memory devices is gaining attention from the research community. First attempts for solving the data I/O were based on ad-hoc arbitrator mechanisms implemented in hardware and controlled by a host [9].…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The primary goal of C-to-silicon synthesis frameworks such as AutoESL [23], Impulse C [7], Synopsys Synphony/PICO [15], CHiMPS [14], and Altera C2H [11] is to reduce the effort that creating accelerators requires, by building them directly from a high-level language. To accelerate execution, these tools must either infer parallel execution from serial code or force the programmer to rewrite their code in a more explicitly parallel language or dialect [18].…”
Section: Icer Performance and Efficiencymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The PACT project [10] at Northwestern University performs C to hardware synthesis by taking power/performance trade off into account. The PICO project [11,12] performs static timing analysis to identify chain of operators to minimize number of cycles while maintaining cycle time constraints.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%