High-dose immunosuppressive therapy and autologous hematopoietic cell transplantation for severe systemic sclerosis: long-term follow-up of the US multicenter pilot study
Abstract:More effective therapeutic strategies are required for patients with poor-prognosis systemic sclerosis (SSc). A phase 2 single-arm study of high-dose immunosuppressive therapy (HDIT) and autologous CD34-selected hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT) was conducted in 34 patients with diffuse cutaneous SSc. HDIT included total body irradiation (800 cGy) with lung shielding, cyclophosphamide (120 mg/kg), and equine antithymocyte globulin (90 mg/kg). Neutrophil and platelet counts were recovered by 9 (range, 7 … Show more
“…Improved skin score and quality of life and at least stabilization of lung function were consistently reported in early phase II trials. [4][5][6][7][8] Recently, the phase II ASSIST 9 and the larger phase III ASTIS 10 prospective randomized trials showed better survival rates and improved skin, lung and functional status in patients treated with AHSCT as compared with monthly IV cyclophosphamide. Still, the transplant-related mortality reaching 10% and disease-progression rates of around 20-30% after AHSCT indicate that further improvements are still warranted.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Still, the transplant-related mortality reaching 10% and disease-progression rates of around 20-30% after AHSCT indicate that further improvements are still warranted. [6][7][8][9][10][11][12] Among current strategies to increase safety and efficacy of AHSCT, the benefit of ex vivo CD34+ positive selection of the graft remains debated. This study was therefore designed to evaluate the influence of ex vivo CD34+ selection on the outcome of SSc patients treated with AHSCT.…”
This EBMT Autoimmune Disease Working Party study aimed to evaluate the influence of CD34+ positive graft selection (CD34+) on the outcome of systemic sclerosis (SSc) patients after autologous hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (AHSCT). Clinical and laboratory data from 138 SSc patients at diagnosis, before and after AHSCT were retrospectively analyzed. CD34+ selection was performed in 47.1% (n = 65) patients. By multivariate analysis adjusting for all factors differing between the two groups (without or with CD34+), there was no statistically significant difference in terms of overall survival (hazard ratio (HR): 0.98, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.40-2.39, P = 0.96), PFS (HR: 1.55, 95% CI 0.83-2.88, P = 0.17) and incidence of relapse or progression (HR: 1.70, 95% CI 0.85-3.38, P = 0.13). We demonstrate that CD34+ does not add benefit to the outcome of SSc patient treated with AHSCT. These findings should be further confirmed by prospective randomized trials.
“…Improved skin score and quality of life and at least stabilization of lung function were consistently reported in early phase II trials. [4][5][6][7][8] Recently, the phase II ASSIST 9 and the larger phase III ASTIS 10 prospective randomized trials showed better survival rates and improved skin, lung and functional status in patients treated with AHSCT as compared with monthly IV cyclophosphamide. Still, the transplant-related mortality reaching 10% and disease-progression rates of around 20-30% after AHSCT indicate that further improvements are still warranted.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Still, the transplant-related mortality reaching 10% and disease-progression rates of around 20-30% after AHSCT indicate that further improvements are still warranted. [6][7][8][9][10][11][12] Among current strategies to increase safety and efficacy of AHSCT, the benefit of ex vivo CD34+ positive selection of the graft remains debated. This study was therefore designed to evaluate the influence of ex vivo CD34+ selection on the outcome of SSc patients treated with AHSCT.…”
This EBMT Autoimmune Disease Working Party study aimed to evaluate the influence of CD34+ positive graft selection (CD34+) on the outcome of systemic sclerosis (SSc) patients after autologous hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (AHSCT). Clinical and laboratory data from 138 SSc patients at diagnosis, before and after AHSCT were retrospectively analyzed. CD34+ selection was performed in 47.1% (n = 65) patients. By multivariate analysis adjusting for all factors differing between the two groups (without or with CD34+), there was no statistically significant difference in terms of overall survival (hazard ratio (HR): 0.98, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.40-2.39, P = 0.96), PFS (HR: 1.55, 95% CI 0.83-2.88, P = 0.17) and incidence of relapse or progression (HR: 1.70, 95% CI 0.85-3.38, P = 0.13). We demonstrate that CD34+ does not add benefit to the outcome of SSc patient treated with AHSCT. These findings should be further confirmed by prospective randomized trials.
“…An approach that began in patients about 14 years ago, hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT), has been demonstrated to improve both skin and lung function as well as quality of life in patients with SSc 6,7,8 . Transplantation has been performed safely in some studies 8 , but results have been complicated by high treatment-related mortality in others 9 . Mortality of HSCT for SSc can be markedly reduced, however, if the reasons for mortality are properly recognized.…”
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.